Guidance for conducting systematic scoping reviews
Guidance for conducting systematic scoping reviews
复制标题
DOI：
10.1097/xeb.0000000000000050
复制
发表时间：
2015-09-01
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Soares, Cassia Baldini
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Peters, Micah D. J.;Godfrey, Christina M.;Soares, Cassia Baldini
随着循证实践作为护理基准的认可，以及初级研究来源的数量和获取途径的增加，对初级研究的审查变得越来越普遍。较新的审查类型之一是范围界定审查。一般来说，范围界定审查通常用于“侦察”——澄清主题或领域的工作定义和概念边界。因此，当大量文献尚未经过全面审查，或者表现出复杂或异质性，不适合对证据进行更精确的系统审查时，范围界定审查特别有用。虽然范围界定审查的目的是确定全面系统评价的价值和可能范围，但范围审查本身也可以作为练习来总结和传播研究结果，找出研究差距，并为未来的研究提出建议。本文简要向读者介绍范围审查、它们与系统审查有何不同，以及为什么要进行它们。下面概述的进行系统范围界定审查的方法和指南是由乔安娜·布里格斯研究所的成员和五个乔安娜·布里格斯合作中心的成员制定的。
Reviews of primary research are becoming more common as evidence-based practice gains recognition as the benchmark for care, and the number of, and access to, primary research sources has grown. One of the newer review types is the scoping review'. In general, scoping reviews are commonly used for reconnaissance' - to clarify working definitions and conceptual boundaries of a topic or field. Scoping reviews are therefore particularly useful when a body of literature has not yet been comprehensively reviewed, or exhibits a complex or heterogeneous nature not amenable to a more precise systematic review of the evidence. While scoping reviews may be conducted to determine the value and probable scope of a full systematic review, they may also be undertaken as exercises in and of themselves to summarize and disseminate research findings, to identify research gaps, and to make recommendations for the future research. This article briefly introduces the reader to scoping reviews, how they are different to systematic reviews, and why they might be conducted. The methodology and guidance for the conduct of systematic scoping reviews outlined below was developed by members of the Joanna Briggs Institute and members of five Joanna Briggs Collaborating Centres.