Nivolumab versus investigator's choice in patients with recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: Efficacy and safety in CheckMate 141 by age.

Nivolumab versus investigator's choice in patients with recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: Efficacy and safety in CheckMate 141 by age.
复制标题

DOI:
10.1016/j.oraloncology.2019.06.017
复制
发表时间:
2019-09
期刊:
影响因子:
4.8
通讯作者:
Brossart P
Brossart P
中科院分区:
医学2区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Saba NF;Blumenschein G Jr;Guigay J;Licitra L;Fayette J;Harrington KJ;Kiyota N;Gillison ML;Ferris RL;Jayaprakash V;Li L;Brossart P

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

许多头颈部鳞状细胞癌患者都是65岁的老年人;合并症和其他年龄相关因素可能会影响他们对传统化疗的耐受性。在第三阶段试验(Checkmate 141)中,与研究人员选择的单剂化疗相比,nivolumab是唯一一种在铂治疗后复发/转移的SCCHN患者中显著提高总存活率(OS)和研究人员选择(IC)的免疫疗法。在这项特殊分析中,我们报告了按年龄分组的疗效和安全性。符合条件的患者按2:1随机分为尼伏单抗3 mg/kg每2周(n=240)或IC(甲氨蝶呤、多西他赛或西妥昔单抗n=121)。试验的主要终点是OS。在这项分析中,结果按65岁和≥65岁进行分析。数据截止日为2017年9月(最低随访24.2个月)。基线时,接受尼伏单抗治疗的68名患者(28.3%)和接受IC治疗的45名患者(37.2%)的≥年龄为65岁。各年龄组的基线特征大体相似。使用nivolumab与IC相比,无论年龄大小,OS和肿瘤反应的益处都保持不变。尼伏单抗治疗30个月的OS率分别为11.2%(65岁)和13.0%(≥65岁),是相应的IC率(1.4%和3.3%)的三倍多。与IC相比,nivolumab ARM的治疗相关不良事件发生率较低,与年龄无关,这与总体患者人数一致。在CHECKMATE141中,尼伏单抗在65岁和≥65岁的患者中导致比IC更高的存活率,在这两个年龄组中都有可管理的安全概况。NCT02105636。
Many patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN) are ≥65 years old; comorbidities and other age-related factors may affect their ability to tolerate traditional chemotherapy. Nivolumab is the only immunotherapy to significantly improve overall survival (OS) versus investigator’s choice (IC) of single-agent chemotherapy at primary analysis in a phase 3 trial (CheckMate 141) in patients with recurrent/metastatic SCCHN post-platinum therapy. In this post hoc analysis, we report efficacy and safety by age. Eligible patients were randomized 2:1 to nivolumab 3 mg/kg every 2 weeks (n = 240) or IC (methotrexate, docetaxel, or cetuximab n = 121). The primary endpoint of the trial was OS. For this analysis, outcomes were analyzed by age < 65 and ≥65 years. The data cut-off date was September 2017 (minimum follow-up 24.2 months). At baseline, 68 patients (28.3%) receiving nivolumab and 45 patients (37.2%) receiving IC were ≥65 years. Baseline characteristics were generally similar across age groups. OS and tumor response benefits with nivolumab versus IC were maintained regardless of age. The 30-month OS rates of 11.2% (< 65 years) and 13.0% (≥65 years) with nivolumab were more than tripled versus corresponding IC rates of 1.4% and 3.3%, respectively. The nivolumab arm had a lower rate of treatment-related adverse events versus IC regardless of age, consistent with the overall patient population. In CheckMate 141, nivolumab resulted in a higher survival versus IC in patients < 65 and ≥65 years, with a manageable safety profile in both age groups. NCT02105636.
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2008.10.026
发表时间: 2009-01-01
影响因子: 8.4
作者:
Eisenhauer, E. A.;Therasse, P.;Verweij, J.
通讯作者: Verweij, J.
DOI: 10.1056/nejmoa032641
发表时间: 2004-05-06
影响因子: 158.5
作者:
Bernier, J;Domenge, C;van Glabbeke, M
通讯作者: van Glabbeke, M
DOI: 10.1634/theoncologist.2017-0674
发表时间: 2018-09-01
期刊: ONCOLOGIST
影响因子: 5.8
作者:
Gillison, Maura L.;Blumenschein, George;Ferris, Robert L.
通讯作者: Ferris, Robert L.
DOI: 10.1200/jco.2004.08.039
发表时间: 2004-01-15
影响因子: 45.3
作者:
Argiris, A;Li, Y;Forastiere, AA
通讯作者: Forastiere, AA
DOI: 10.2307/2281868
发表时间: 1958-01-01
影响因子: 3.7
作者:
KAPLAN, EL;MEIER, P
通讯作者: MEIER, P