The Political Economy of the Service Transition
The Political Economy of the Service Transition
复制标题
服务转型的政治经济学
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2013
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
A. Wren
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
A. Wren
在过去的四十年里，最富有的经合组织经济体--欧洲、北美和澳大拉西亚--都面临着巨大的结构性变化。工业部门曾被视为这些社会的经济支柱，但其规模和经济重要性已不可阻挡地缩小，而服务部门则成为产出和就业扩大的主要引擎。这对劳动力市场的影响是深远的：在许多经合组织国家，超过四分之三的就业现在是在服务业，而工业部门平均占不到五分之一。经济活动中心的这种部门性转移可能对政治和社会产生根本性影响。然而，这些影响才刚刚开始被理解。这本开创性的书是一个系统的尝试，以了解服务社会的独特的政治经济学。它研究了不同类型的社会经济制度如何管理服务转型，重点关注就业机会的创造和破坏以及劳动力市场不断变化的特征，并表明与之相关的经济，分配和政治结果因国家而异，取决于他们的政治制度结构。本书的贡献者- Karen M.安德森，荷兰拉德布德大学本·安塞尔，美国明尼苏达大学露西·巴恩斯，英国牛津大学马特·福多，爱尔兰都柏林Trinity学院简·金里奇，明尼苏达大学安科·哈塞尔，德国赫尔蒂治理学院托本·艾弗森，哈佛大学菲利普·马诺，不莱梅大学莫伊拉·纳尔逊，荷兰阿姆斯特丹自由大学菲利普·马雷姆姆，欧洲大学研究所弗朗西斯·罗森布鲁斯，耶鲁大学Gijs Schumacher，VU阿姆斯特丹大学，荷兰大卫索斯基斯，牛津大学，英国John Stephens，北卡罗来纳州大学，美国Sotiria Theodoropoulou，欧洲工会研究所，布鲁塞尔，比利时Kees货车Kersbergen，奥胡斯大学
Over the past four decades the wealthiest OECD economies-in Europe, North America, and Australasia- have faced massive structural change. Industrial sectors, which were once considered the economic backbone of these societies, have shrunk inexorably in terms of size and economic significance, while service sectors have taken over as the primary engines of output and employment expansion. The impact on labor markets has been profound: in many OECD countries more than three-quarters of employment is now in services, while industrial sectors, on average, account for less than one-fifth. This sectoral shift in the locus of economic activity has potentially radical implications for politics and society. However, these implications are only beginning to be understood. This path-breaking book is a systematic attempt to understand the distinct political economy of service societies. It examines how different types of socio-economic regimes manage the service transition, with a central focus on job creation and destruction and the changing characteristics of labor markets, and shows that the economic, distributional, and political outcomes with which it is associated vary across countries depending on their political-institutional structures. Contributors to this volume - Karen M. Anderson, Radboud University, the Netherlands Ben Ansell, University of Minnesota, USA Lucy Barnes, University of Oxford, UK Mate Fodor, Trinity College Dublin, Ireland Jane Gingrich, University of Minnesota Anke Hassel, Hertie School of Governance, Germany Torben Iversen, Harvard University Philip Manow, Bremen University Moira Nelson , VU University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands Philipp Rehm, European University Institute Frances Rosenbluth, Yale University Gijs Schumacher, VU University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands David Soskice, University of Oxford, UK John Stephens, University of North Carolina, USA Sotiria Theodoropoulou, European Trade Union Institute, Brussels, Belgium Kees Van Kersbergen, Aarhus University