COGNITIVE ARITHMETIC - EVIDENCE FOR RETRIEVAL AND DECISION-PROCESSES IN MENTAL ADDITION
COGNITIVE ARITHMETIC - EVIDENCE FOR RETRIEVAL AND DECISION-PROCESSES IN MENTAL ADDITION
复制标题
DOI：
10.1037/0278-7393.4.5.527
复制
发表时间：
1978-01-01
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
BATTAGLIA, J
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
ASHCRAFT, MH;BATTAGLIA, J
两个实验，每个有12名大学生，检查简单的加法过程中，提出了一个整数问题的真假验证。错误问题的陈述金额与正确金额相差合理（X 1或2）或不合理（X 4或5）。对不合理错误问题的反应时（RT）明显快于对合理错误问题的反应时，对真实问题的反应时总体上最快。真实和合理错误刺激的反应时的最佳预测因子是正确和的平方;对于不合理错误问题，最小加数解释了大部分方差。实验二复制了上述效果，并发现促进RT立即重复刺激。结果与严格计数或检索计数加法模型不一致。相反，RT模式支持的检索决策模型，除了在内存中，并解释为类似的搜索和距离效应在语义信息处理。(15参考）（PsycINFO数据库记录（c）2016阿帕，保留所有权利）
Two experiments, each with 12 undergraduates, examined simple addition processes in which single integer problems were presented for true–false verification. The stated sums of the false problems were incorrect by a reasonable (X 1 or 2) or unreasonable (X 4 or 5) amount from the correct sums. The reaction time (RT) to unreasonable wrong problems was significantly faster than to reasonable wrong problems, and RT to true problems was fastest overall. The best predictor of RT to true and reasonable false stimuli was the square of the correct sum; for the unreasonable false problems, the minimum addend accounted for most of the variance. Exp II replicated the above effects and found facilitation of RT with immediately repeated stimuli. Results are inconsistent with strictly counting or retrieval-counting models of addition. Instead, the RT patterns support a retrieval-decision model of addition in memory and are interpreted as analogous to search and distance effects in semantic information processing.(15 ref)(PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved)