Digital Pain Drawings Assessing Touch-Screen Technology and 3D Body Schemas

Digital Pain Drawings Assessing Touch-Screen Technology and 3D Body Schemas
复制标题

DOI:
10.1097/ajp.0000000000000230
复制
发表时间:
2016-02-01
影响因子:
2.9
通讯作者:
Egsgaard, Line L.
Egsgaard, Line L.
中科院分区:
医学2区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Boudreau, Shellie A.;Badsberg, Susanne;Egsgaard, Line L.

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

目的:评估的一致性和水平的协议之间收集的疼痛图纸(1)纸和个人电脑平板电脑;(2)之间的2维(2D)线图和3维(3D)身体schema.Materials和方法:无痛参与者(N=24)重新创建一个预先标记的“疼痛”区域从一个二维线图显示在纸上或平板电脑上,和个人慢性颈部疼痛(N=29)表示他们目前的疼痛在纸上和平板电脑。一个异质组(N=26)从跨学科的疼痛诊所,并表示他们的痛苦上的二维线条画和三维身体图式,显示在平板电脑上,然后完成了用户体验questionnaire.Results:疼痛图纸表现出中度到高度的一致性和高水平的协议,纸张和平板电脑之间的二维线条画和三维身体图式。固定偏倚(-1.0042,P < 0.001)显示,在纸上绘制的疼痛区域比在平板电脑上绘制的疼痛区域略小,在2D上绘制的疼痛区域比在3D身体图式上绘制的疼痛区域大(-0.6371,P=0.003),如在平板电脑上记录的。超过三分之一的慢性疼痛的个人首选和/或认为,3D的身体模式,使一个更准确的records; 12认为他们是平等的,和3个首选的2D linedrawing.Discussion:疼痛图纸记录与触摸屏技术提供同等的可靠性纸,但图纸的大小略有不同的平台。虽然,2D线条图和3D身体图式在一致性和可靠性方面是相似的,但3D身体图式是否增加了疼痛图的准确性和精确性仍有待证实。
Objectives:To assess the consistency and level of agreement between pain drawings collected on (1) paper and a personal computer tablet; and (2) between a 2-dimensional (2D) line drawing and 3-dimensional (3D) body schema.Materials and Methods:Pain-free participants (N=24) recreated a premarked "pain" area from a 2D line drawing displayed on paper onto paper or tablet, and individuals with chronic neck pain (N=29) expressed their current pain on paper and tablet. A heterogeneous group (N=26) was recruited from cross-disciplinary pain clinic and expressed their pain on a 2D line drawing and a 3D body schema, as displayed on a tablet, and then completed an user-experience questionnaire.Results:Pain drawings showed moderate to high level of consistency and a high level of agreement for paper and tablet and between 2D line drawing and 3D body schema. A fixed bias (-1.0042, P < 0.001) revealed that pain areas were drawn slightly smaller on paper than on tablet, and larger on the 2D than the 3D body schema (-0.6371, P=0.003), as recorded on a tablet. Over one-third of individuals with chronic pain preferred and/or believed that the 3D body schema enabled a more accurate record; 12 believed they were equal, and 3 preferred the 2D line drawing.Discussion:Pain drawings recorded with touch-screen technology provide equal reliability to paper but the size of the drawing slightly differs between the platforms. Although, 2D line drawings and 3D body schemas were similar in terms of consistency and reliability, it remains to be confirmed whether 3D body schemas increase the accuracy and precision of pain drawings.