Development of a reliable method to assess footwear comfort during running

Development of a reliable method to assess footwear comfort during running
复制标题

DOI:
10.1016/s0966-6362(01)00197-7
复制
发表时间:
2002-08-01
期刊:
影响因子:
2.4
通讯作者:
Humble, RN
Humble, RN
中科院分区:
医学3区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Mündermann, A;Nigg, BM;Humble, RN

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

本研究的目的是:(a)确定受试者是否能够区分鞋类舒适度方面的差异;(B)确定使用视觉模拟量表(VAS)和包括跑步期间控制条件的协议评估鞋类舒适度的可靠性。组内相关系数(ICC)之间的舒适度评级重复条件高(ICC = 0.799)。衬垫条件之间的舒适度评分差异显著。配对t检验显示,与在硬衬垫后进行测试相比,在软衬垫后进行测试时,对照衬垫的总体舒适度评分存在显著差异(P = 0.008)。这项研究的结果表明,VAS提供了一个可靠的措施,以评估鞋类舒适度在运行的条件下:(a)控制条件包括在内;和(B)的平均舒适度评级的会话4-6使用。(C)2002爱思唯尔科技有限公司。保留所有权利。
The purposes of this study were: (a) to determine whether subjects are able to distinguish between differences in footwear with respect to footwear comfort; and (b) to determine how reliably footwear comfort can be assessed using a visual analogue scale (VAS) and a protocol including a control condition during running. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) between comfort ratings for repeated conditions were high (ICC = 0.799). Differences in comfort ratings between the insert conditions were significant. A paired t-test revealed a significant difference in overall comfort ratings for the control insert when tested after the soft insert compared to when tested after the hard insert (P = 0.008). The results of this study showed that VASs provide a reliable measure to assess footwear comfort during running under the conditions that: (a) a control condition is included; and (b) the average comfort rating of sessions 4-6 is used. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.