PRESENCE, COMPLETENESS, AND ACCURACY OF MAIN CONCEPTS IN THE CONNECTED SPEECH OF NON-BRAIN-DAMAGED ADULTS AND ADULTS WITH APHASIA
PRESENCE, COMPLETENESS, AND ACCURACY OF MAIN CONCEPTS IN THE CONNECTED SPEECH OF NON-BRAIN-DAMAGED ADULTS AND ADULTS WITH APHASIA
复制标题
DOI：
10.1044/jshr.3801.145
复制
发表时间：
1995-02-01
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
BROOKSHIRE, RH
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
NICHOLAS, LE;BROOKSHIRE, RH
一个标准的规则为基础的系统被用来评估的存在，准确性和完整性的主要概念，在连接语音的20名非脑损伤的成年人和20名成人失语症。主要概念构成了信息中最重要信息（或“要点”）的骨架。主要概念评分系统的判断者间和判断者内的信度以及得分的重测稳定性都是可以接受的。与失语组相比，非脑损伤组产生的准确/完整的主要概念显著更多，准确/不完整、不准确和缺失的主要概念显著更少。然而，当对个体受试者的表现进行评估时，最能区分失语症受试者与非脑损伤受试者的表现的不是他们未能提及的主要概念的数量，而是他们确实产生的主要概念的准确性和完整性。主要概念生产的措施可能是一个临床上有用的补充，其他措施的沟通信息和效率。
A standard rule-based system was used to evaluate the presence, accuracy, and completeness of main concepts in the connected speech of 20 non-brain-damaged adults and 20 adults with aphasia. Main concepts form a skeletal outline of the most important information (or ''gist'') in a message. The interjudge and intrajudge reliabiity of the main concept scoring system and the test-retest stability of scores were acceptable. The non-brain-damaged group produced significantly more Accurate/complete main concepts, and significantly fewer Accurate/incomplete, Inaccurate, and Absent main concepts than the group with aphasia. However, when the performance of individual subjects was evaluated, what best discriminated the performance of subjects with aphasia from that of non-brain-damaged subjects was not the number of main concepts they failed to mention but the accuracy and completeness of the main concepts they did produce. Measures of main concept production may be a clinically useful complement to other measures of communicative informativeness and efficiency.