The Micro-Macro Constitution of Power
The Micro-Macro Constitution of Power
复制标题
权力的微观与宏观构成
DOI：
10.2139/ssrn.1829901
复制
发表时间：
2003
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
C. Castelfranchi
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
C. Castelfranchi
这项工作的重点是个人权力、社会权力和制度权力之间复杂而辩证的关系。这种区别并不新鲜，它甚至是显而易见的或常识性的。然而，首先，并非所有学科都承认权力的这种多层次性质(例如，社会学通常拒绝个人权力与社会权力之间的联系的想法)；其次，在我们看来，没有一个很好的分析理论来分析个人和人际层面的权力，以及它们与权力的关系--这些关系不是那么明显--我们更喜欢将其称为“制度”(其中，“法律”方面的权力只是一个子案例，不仅基于惯例、传统和社会规范，而且基于法律体系)。例如，“体力”这个词有点简单化，因为实际上一个人不仅需要力量、技能和工作身体，而且需要适当的行动计划和相关的信息，即知识，以及所需的精神能力和条件(动机、意识、信心等)。
The focus of this work is the complex and dialectic relationship between personal, social, and institutional powers. This distinction is not new, it is even obvious or commonsensical. However, first, this multi-layered nature of power is not acknowledged in all the disciplines (for instance sociology typically rejects the idea of a connection between the personal powers and the social ones); second, in our view there is not a good analytic theory of the personal and interpersonal layers of power and of their – not so obvious – relationships with the power that we prefer to call “institutional” (where the “legal” one is just a sub-case based not simply on conventions, traditions, and social norms but on a system of laws). For example, the term “physical power” is a bit reductive, since in fact one not only needs strength, skills, and a working body, but the appropriate action plan and the relevant information, i.e. knowledge, and also the required mental abilities and conditions (motives, awareness, confidence, and so on).