Electrophysiological correlates of complement coercion.

Electrophysiological correlates of complement coercion.
复制标题

补体胁迫的电生理相关性。

DOI:
10.1162/jocn.2009.21333
复制
发表时间:
2010-12
影响因子:
3.2
通讯作者:
Jackendoff R
Jackendoff R
中科院分区:
医学3区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Kuperberg GR;Choi A;Cohn N;Paczynski M;Jackendoff R

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

This study examined the electrophysiological correlates of complement coercion. Event-related potentials (ERPs) were measured as participants read and made acceptability judgments about plausible coerced sentences, plausible non-coerced sentences, and highly implausible animacy violated sentences (“The journalist began/wrote/astonished the article before his coffee break”). Relative to non-coerced complement nouns, the coerced nouns evoked an N400 effect. This effect was not modulated by the number of possible activities implied by the coerced nouns (e.g. began reading the article; began writing the article), and did not differ in either magnitude or scalp distribution from the N400 effect evoked by the animacy violated complement nouns. We suggest that the N400 modulation to both coerced and the animacy violated complement nouns reflected different types of mismatches between the semantic restrictions of the verb and the semantic properties of the incoming complement noun. This is consistent with models holding that a verb’s semantic argument structure is represented and stored at a distinct level from its syntactic argument structure. Unlike the coerced complement noun, the animacy violated nouns also evoked a robust P600 effect, which may have been triggered by the judgments of the highly implausible (syntactically-determined) meanings of the animacy violated propositions. No additional ERP effects were seen in the coerced sentences until the sentence-final word which, relative to sentence-final words in the non-coerced sentences, evoked a sustained anteriorly-distributed positivity. We suggest that this effect reflected delayed attempts to retrieve the specific event(s) implied by coerced complement nouns.
DOI: 10.1080/01690969308407585
发表时间: 1993-11-01
期刊: LANGUAGE AND COGNITIVE PROCESSES
影响因子: --
作者:
HAGOORT, P;BROWN, C;GROOTHUSEN, J
通讯作者: GROOTHUSEN, J
DOI: 10.1023/a:1014376204525
发表时间: 2002-01-01
影响因子: 2
作者:
Friederici, AD;Hahne, A;Saddy, D
通讯作者: Saddy, D
DOI: 10.1007/bf02289823
发表时间: 1959-01-01
期刊: PSYCHOMETRIKA
影响因子: 3
作者:
GREENHOUSE, SW;GEISSER, S
通讯作者: GEISSER, S
DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2006.07.048
发表时间: 2006-10-30
期刊: BRAIN RESEARCH
影响因子: 2.9
作者:
Dwivedi, Veena D.;Phillips, Natalie A.;Baum, Shari R.
通讯作者: Baum, Shari R.
DOI: 10.1016/0013-4694(85)90008-2
发表时间: 1985-01-01
期刊: ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY AND CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY
影响因子: --
作者:
BENTIN, S;MCCARTHY, G;WOOD, CC
通讯作者: WOOD, CC