Phase 3 trial of sequential versus combination treatment in colorectal cancer: The C-cubed study
Phase 3 trial of sequential versus combination treatment in colorectal cancer: The C-cubed study
复制标题
DOI:
10.1016/j.ejca.2022.04.009
复制
发表时间:
2022-07-01
影响因子:
8.4
通讯作者:
Yamaguchi,Yoshiyuki
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Inada,Ryo;Nagasaka,Takeshi;Yamaguchi,Yoshiyuki
BackgroundAn optimal treatment strategy using oxaliplatin and bevacizumab for metastatic colorectal cancer has not been defined. We investigated whether the sequential treatment using fluoropyrimidines with bevacizumab followed by the addition of oxaliplatin at first progression was better than a combination treatment using fluoropyrimidines and oxaliplatin with bevacizumab.MethodsIn the sequential treatment, the escalation from fluoropyrimidines plus bevacizumab to fluoropyrimidines plus oxaliplatin with bevacizumab was recommended in case of progressive disease. Time to failure of strategy was the primary end-point, whereas the secondary end-points were overall survival, progression-free survival, overall response rate and safety.ResultsThree hundred patients with previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer were randomised to receive either the sequential treatment (n = 151) or the combination treatment (n = 149). The sequential treatment was superior to the combination treatment about time to failure of strategy (15.2 months; 95% CI, 12.5–17.2 months vs. 7.8 months: 95% CI, 6.3–9.5 months;P< 0.001). However, the median overall survival was 27.5 (95% CI, 24.4 to 32.7) months in the sequential treatment and 27.0 (95% CI, 22.8 to 36.0) months in the combination treatment (hazard ratio, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.66 to 1.28;P= 0.61). The overall response rate was 33.1% in the sequential treatment arm and 51.7% in the combination treatment.ConclusionsThe findings support the extension of the sequential treatment starting from fluoropyrimidine plus bevacizumab to selected patients who do not need an objective response to the threatening disease.