Intended and Unintended Consequences of a Publish-or-Perish Culture: A Worldwide Survey

Intended and Unintended Consequences of a Publish-or-Perish Culture: A Worldwide Survey
复制标题

出版或灭亡文化的有意和无意的后果:一项全球调查

DOI:
10.2139/ssrn.1983205
复制
发表时间:
2012
期刊:
Labor: Human Capital eJournal
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
K. Henkens
K. Henkens
中科院分区:
--
文献类型:
--
作者:
H. P. Dalen;K. Henkens

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

现代大学的出版压力如何影响科学的内在和外在回报?通过对发达国家和发展中国家的人口学家进行全球调查,作者表明,绝大多数人认为出版压力很大,但盎格鲁-撒克逊国家的压力更大,西欧的压力较小。然而,学者们既看到了优点(向上流动),也看到了缺点(过多的出版和出版,忽视政策问题等)。不死不休的文化通过测量行为方面的阅读和出版,和感知的外在奖励和所述的内在奖励的实践科学,结果表明,出版压力产生负面影响的方向人口学家对政策和知识共享。没有迹象表明这种压力影响到核心学科以外的阅读和出版。© 2012 Wiley Periodicals,Inc.
How does publication pressure in modern-day universities affect the intrinsic and extrinsic rewards in science? By using a worldwide survey among demographers in developed and developing countries, the authors show that the large majority perceive the publication pressure as high, but more so in Anglo-Saxon countries and to a lesser extent in Western Europe. However, scholars see both the pros (upward mobility) and cons (excessive publication and uncitedness, neglect of policy issues, etc.) of the so-called publish-or-perish culture. By measuring behavior in terms of reading and publishing, and perceived extrinsic rewards and stated intrinsic rewards of practicing science, it turns out that publication pressure negatively affects the orientation of demographers towards policy and knowledge sharing. There are no signs that the pressure affects reading and publishing outside the core discipline. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.