Unpacking Taiwan's Presence in Southeast Asia: The International Socialization of the New Southbound Policy

Unpacking Taiwan's Presence in Southeast Asia: The International Socialization of the New Southbound Policy
复制标题

解析台湾在东南亚的存在:新南向政策的国际社会化

DOI:
10.1142/s1013251118400039
复制
发表时间:
2018
期刊:
Issues & Studies: A Social Science Quarterly on China, Taiwan, and East Asian Affairs
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Alan H. Yang
Alan H. Yang
中科院分区:
--
文献类型:
--
作者:
Yumi Kitamura;Yumi Kitamura;Hew Wai Weng;Thomas Alexander Charles Barker;Alan H. Yang

文献摘要

相似文献

在过去的三十年里,台湾一直在努力获得优势,并在亚洲发挥作用。这个岛国一直在努力通过参与东南亚及其他地区的区域一体化来平衡与中国的不对称关系。1990年代,台湾政府发起了第一波南向政策,旨在与该地区建立商业和政府层面的联系。南向政策的制度和社会遗产促成了2015年底提出的新南向政策(NSP)的制定。本文将透过新社会政策的国际社会化过程,以及台湾与东南亚的策略互动,来解读台湾在东南亚的存在。全文共分四个部分:第一部分介绍了国际社会化的概念。第二节论述台湾历次南向政策的定位。从“台湾的亚洲”心态到“亚洲的台湾”心态的转变,详细描述了台湾一系列的南向活动如何融入该地区的国际社会化进程。第三节着重介绍了该政策的主要行为者和利益攸关方,包括跨国行为者,正在与东南亚的对应方建立的关系,以及目前正在促进的新的社会联系。这包括在东南亚的台湾居民和在台湾的东南亚移民的活动。本文最后总结了台湾在亚洲的国际社会化。
Over the past three decades, Taiwan has been struggling to gain an advantage and develop its role in Asia. This island has strived to balance its asymmetric relationship with China by engaging in regional integration in Southeast Asia and beyond. In the 1990s, the Taiwan government initiated the first wave of its Go South Policy aimed at building links at business and government levels with that region. The institutional and social legacy of the Go South Policy contributed to the making of the New Southbound Policy (NSP) which was proposed toward the end of 2015. This paper will unpack Taiwan’s presence in Southeast Asia by highlighting the international socialization process of the NSP and Taiwan’s strategic interaction with the region. It consists of four sections: the first section introduces the concept of international socialization. The second section discusses the positioning of Taiwan’s previous Go South policies. Starting with the shift from a mentality of “Taiwanese Asia”(Taiwan de yazhou,) to one of “Asian Taiwan”(Yazhou de Taiwan,), it describes in detail how Taiwan’s successive southward engagement initiatives have blended into the international socialization processes in the region. The third section highlights the relationships the policy’s key actors and stakeholders, including transnational actors, are establishing with their counterparts in Southeast Asia and the new social linkages that are currently being promoted. This includes the activities of Taiwanese residents in Southeast Asia and Southeast Asian migrants in Taiwan. The paper concludes by summarizing Taiwan’s international socialization in Asia.