Using reflexivity to optimize teamwork in qualitative research
Using reflexivity to optimize teamwork in qualitative research
复制标题
DOI：
10.1177/104973299129121677
复制
发表时间：
1999-01-01
影响因子：
3.2
通讯作者：
Stevenson, F
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Barry, CA;Britten, N;Stevenson, F
反身性通常被描述为一种个人活动。作者提出，将反思性作为一项团队活动，通过分享反思性写作（个人议程、隐藏假设和理论定义）和对出现的问题进行小组讨论，可以提高定性团队的生产力和运作以及研究的严谨性和质量。作者回顾了有关团队合作的文献，强调了好处和陷阱，并定义和讨论了反思性的作用。他们描述了自己的团队，并详细介绍了他们如何在一个调查医患处方沟通的项目中合作。作者介绍了他们使用过的两种反思工具，并通过示例展示了它们如何影响团队的有效性：流程、质量和结果。
Reflexivity is often described as an individual activity. The authors propose that reflexivity employed as a team activity, through the sharing of reflexive writing (accounts of personal agendas, hidden assumptions, and theoretical definitions) and group discussions about arising issues, can improve the productivity and functioning of qualitative teams and the rigor and quality of the research. The authors review the literature on teamwork, highlighting benefits and pitfalls, and define and discuss the role for reflexivity. They describe their own team and detail how they work together on a project investigating doctor-patient communication about prescribing. The authors present two reflexive tools they have used and show through examples how they have influenced the effectiveness of their team in: terms of process, quality, and outcome.