Crosslinguistic influence in bilingual language acquisition: Italian and French as recipient languages
Crosslinguistic influence in bilingual language acquisition: Italian and French as recipient languages
复制标题
双语习得中的跨语言影响：意大利语和法语作为接受语言
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2001
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
A. Hulk
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Natascha Müller;A. Hulk
在本文中，我们想比较的结果，从单语儿童的对象省略双语儿童谁获得了两种语言的同时。我们的纵向研究双语荷兰语，法语，德语，法语和德语，意大利语的儿童表明，双语儿童的行为像单语儿童关于对象省略的类型在罗曼语。他们与单语儿童的不同之处在于使用物体下降的程度。与此同时，孩子们区分他们使用的两种系统。我们想主张，单语儿童和双语儿童在罗曼语宾语省略方面的差异是由于双语儿童的跨语言影响：日耳曼语影响罗曼语。如果A语言中的一个句法结构允许从儿童语法的角度进行不止一种语法分析，而B语言包含了这些可能分析之一的积极证据，那么就会发生跨语言影响。双语儿童不能像单语儿童那样迅速地将普遍策略映射到特定语言规则上，因为他/她面临着更广泛的特定语言句法可能性。其中一种可能性似乎与一种普遍的战略相一致。我们想论证跨语言影响的存在，这种影响是由普遍原则映射到特定语言原则上引起的，特别是语用原则映射到句法原则上。该影响将被定义为标测诱导影响。我们将通过在前S位置假设一个空的话语连接的PRO来解释宾语省略（Müller，Crysmann，and Kaiser，1996; Hulk，1997）。像单语儿童一样，双语儿童使用这种可能性，直到他们在目标形式中显示出C系统（完整子句）的证据。
In this paper we want to compare the results from monolingual children with object omissions in bilingual children who have acquired two languages simultaneously. Our longitudinal studies of bilingual Dutch–French, German–French, and German–Italian children show that the bilingual children behave like monolingual children regarding the type of object omissions in the Romance languages. They differ from monolingual children with respect to the extent to which object drop is used. At the same time, the children differentiate the two systems they are using. We want to claim that the difference between monolingual and bilingual children concerning object omissions in the Romance languages is due to crosslinguistic influence in bilingual children: the Germanic language influences the Romance language. Crosslinguistic influence occurs once a syntactic construction in language A allows for more than one grammatical analysis from the perspective of child grammar and language B contains positive evidence for one of these possible analyses. The bilingual child is not able to map the universal strategies onto language-specific rules as quickly as the monolinguals, since s/he is confronted with a much wider range of language-specific syntactic possibilities. One of the possibilities seems to be compatible with a universal strategy. We would like to argue for the existence of crosslinguistic influence, induced by the mapping of universal principles onto language-specific principles – in particular, pragmatic onto syntactic principles. This influence will be defined as mapping induced influence. We will account for the object omissions by postulating an empty discourse-connected PRO in pre-S position (Müller, Crysmann, and Kaiser, 1996; Hulk, 1997). Like monolingual children, bilingual children use this possibility until they show evidence of the C-system (the full clause) in its target form.
DOI：
10.1044/jshr.3906.1239
发表时间：
1996-12-01
期刊：
JOURNAL OF SPEECH AND HEARING RESEARCH
影响因子：
--
作者：
Rice, ML;Wexler, K
通讯作者：
Wexler, K