Implicit partisanship: taking sides for no reason.
Implicit partisanship: taking sides for no reason.
复制标题
DOI：
10.1037/0022-3514.83.2.367
复制
发表时间：
2002-08
影响因子：
7.6
通讯作者：
A. Greenwald;Jacqueline E. Pickrell;S. Farnham
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
A. Greenwald;Jacqueline E. Pickrell;S. Farnham
在花费45秒的时间研究一个假设群体中4个成员的名字后，被试表现出对该群体的内隐喜爱和内隐认同。这些研究名字的影响比仅仅接触要大得多（R。B。Zajonc，1968）的影响，无论是6（实验2）或10（实验3）额外暴露于每个名字。这种隐含的党派效应不同于最小的群体效应（H。Tajfel，1970），因为它的程序不涉及目标群体的成员资格。它也不同于单纯的暴露效应，因为目标刺激是作为一个群体的成员而不是作为不相关的个体多次呈现的。一个看似合理（但尚未确立）的解释是，态度和认同效应是纯粹分类的结果。
After spending 45 s studying the names of 4 members of a hypothetical group, subjects showed both implicit liking and implicit identification with the group. These effects of studying names were much larger than the mere exposure (R. B. Zajonc, 1968) effects of either 6 (Experiment 2) or 10 (Experiment 3) extra exposures to each name. This implicit partisanship effect differs from the minimal group effect (H. Tajfel, 1970) because its procedure involves no membership in the target group. It also differs from the mere exposure effect because the target stimuli are presented once as members of a group rather than multiple times as unrelated individuals. A plausible (but not established) interpretation is that the attitude and identification effects are consequences of mere categorization.