Treatment of renal allograft rejection with T10B9.1A31 or OKT3 - Final analysis of a phase II clinical trial
Treatment of renal allograft rejection with T10B9.1A31 or OKT3 - Final analysis of a phase II clinical trial
复制标题
DOI:
10.1097/00007890-199707270-00017
复制
发表时间:
1997-07-27
期刊:
影响因子:
6.2
通讯作者:
Skeeters, LJ
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Waid, TH;Lucas, BA;Skeeters, LJ
Background. Treatment of acute renal allograft rejection with the monoclonal antibody (mAb) OKT3 has been shown to be superior to treatment with polyclonal antisera. To date, only OKT3 has demonstrated consistent efficacy in reversing rejection crisis.Methods. From 1989 to 1993, a phase II trial comparing the mAb T10B9.1A31 (T10B9) with OKT3 for treatment of acute cellular rejection in renal allograft recipients was done at the University of Kentucky. We collected data from 178 patients potentially eligible to enter the study; 48 never rejected, 9 refused, 13 could not be biopsied, 16 received methylprednisolone, and 11 received antithymocyte globulin or OKT3. Altogether, 81 patients entered the study, 76 of whom were able to be evaluated. Patients with biopsy-confirmed acute rejection were randomly assigned to T10B9 or OKT3 for at least 10 days.Results. Demographically, there was no difference between the T10B9 or OKT3 cohorts. Actuarial graft survival at 4 years was 87% for patients receiving T10B9, 79% for those receiving OKT3, and 89% for those receiving both mAbs (P=0.55). Patient survival at 4 years was 94% for T10B9, 100% for OKT3, and 89% for both mAbs (P=0.45). Mean creatinines of the cohorts were no different at 1, 6, 12, 24, and 36 months. There was less cytokine nephropathy (P