Evaluating replicability of factors in the revised NEO personality inventory: Confirmatory factor analysis versus procrustes rotation
Evaluating replicability of factors in the revised NEO personality inventory: Confirmatory factor analysis versus procrustes rotation
复制标题
DOI：
10.1037/0022-3514.70.3.552
复制
发表时间：
1996-03-01
影响因子：
7.6
通讯作者：
Paunonen, SV
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
McCrae, RR;Zonderman, AB;Paunonen, SV
尽管人格五因素模型具有经验稳健性，但最近NEO人格量表（NEO- pi）数据的验证性因素分析（CFAs）表明它们并不符合假设模型。在一项对229名成年人的重复研究中，一系列的cfa表明，修订后的NEO-PI量表并非结构简单，而是接近规范的五因子结构。然而，CFA拟合优度指数并不高。可比性分析表明，不超过5个因素是可复制的，这就对使用CFA的一些假设提出了质疑。提出了一种使用目标旋转的替代方法，并使用中文和日文NEO-PI修订版的数据进行了说明，这些数据清楚地复制了五因子结构。
Despite the empirical robustness of the 5-factor model of personality, recent confirmatory factor analyses (CFAs) of NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI) data suggest they do not fit the hypothesized model. In a replication study of 229 adults, a series of CFAs showed that Revised NEO-PI scales are not simple-structured but do approximate the normative 5-factor structure. CFA goodness-of-fit indices, however, were not high. Comparability analyses showed that no more than 5 factors were replicable, which calls into question some assumptions underlying the use of CFA. An alternative method that uses targeted rotation was presented and illustrated with data from Chinese and Japanese versions of the Revised NEO-PI that clearly replicated the 5-factor structure.