Mirror-image discrimination among nonliterate, monoliterate, and biliterate Tamil subjects
Mirror-image discrimination among nonliterate, monoliterate, and biliterate Tamil subjects
复制标题
不识字、单字和双文泰米尔受试者之间的镜像歧视
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2003
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Eric Pederson
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Eric Pederson
在Danziger&Pederson 1998年，有人提出，在部分/全部判断任务中，对左右镜像和非反射镜像的区分不仅与识字程度有关，而且与被试识字的文字性质有关。这项后续研究直接解决了这一假设，方法是比较泰米尔语使用者的接受/拒绝反应以及这些反应的反应时间，这些人的识字类型(不识字，只懂泰米尔语，懂泰米尔语和罗马语)。说一文和两文的人之间有一个可靠的区别，那就是说两文的泰米尔语比说一文的泰米尔语更容易拒绝镜像。单文和双文之间的关键区别被认为是是否已经获得了左/右反射之间的字形区别(即，具有象征意义的区别)。
In Danziger & Pederson 1998, the suggestion was made that the discrimination of left/right mirror images from non-reflected images in a part/whole judgment task correlates not just with degree of literacy, but also with the nature of the script in wich the subject is literate. This follow-up study directly addresses this hypothesis by comparing acceptance/rejection responses and the reaction time of these responses among Tamil speakers who were coded for type of literacy (nonliterate, literate only with Tamil script, literate with Tamil and Roman script). There was a reliable difference between the monoliterate and biliterate speakers in that biliterate Tamils were far more likely to reject mirror images than monoliterate Tamils. The critical difference between the monoliterates and biliterates is taken to be whether a graphemic distinction (i.e. a distinction which is symbolically meaningful) between left/right reflections has been acquired.