Co-creation Patterns between Designers and Users in the Design Process: A View of Reflexivity

Co-creation Patterns between Designers and Users in the Design Process: A View of Reflexivity
复制标题

设计过程中设计师和用户之间的共同创造模式:反思性的观点

DOI:
10.1007/978-3-319-06701-8_3
复制
发表时间:
2014
期刊:
In Advancing the Impact of Design Science: Moving from Theory to Practice, Springer International Publishing
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Jaehyun Park & Hyun-A Park
Jaehyun Park & Hyun-A Park
中科院分区:
--
文献类型:
--
作者:
Azab;Ahmed; Mostafa;Noha; and Park;Jaehyun;Jaehyun Park;Jaehyun Park & Hyun-A Park

文献摘要

相似文献

本文以设计反身性为视角,实证探讨了设计创新过程中设计师与用户的共同创造模式。这篇论文包含两个命题。首先,设计师和用户之间的共同创造是发现和验证复杂设计信息环境的核心行动。其次,设计师和用户之间的共同创造可以通过两个反身性概念来识别:设计反身性和角色反身性。基于这两个关于设计师与用户共同创造的命题,我们提出了以下研究问题:(1)在设计过程中,设计师与用户的共同创造是如何塑造出独特的模式的?(2)在设计过程中,设计师-用户共同创造模式如何改变设计流程?作为实证研究方法,本研究分析了40个IT和设计创新项目叙事,并综合了五种设计师-用户共同创造模式(两种设计反身性和三种角色反身性)。本研究的意义在于揭示共同创造在设计师与用户交互中的重要性,并试图对共同创造的模式进行实证探索,为设计过程共同体的研究者和实践者提供理论/实践指导。
In this paper, we empirically explore designer-user co-creation patterns in the design innovation process with a view of design reflexivity. This paper entails two propositions. First, co-creation between designers and users function as the core action in discovering and validating complex design information environments. Second, co-creation between designers and users can be identified by two reflexivity concepts: design reflexivity and role reflexivity. With these two propositions on designer-user co-creation, we ask the following research questions: (1) what do co-creation between designers and users characterize distinctive patterns in the design process? (2) How do designer-user co-creation patterns change a design routine in a design process? As an empirical approach, this study analyzed forty IT & design innovation project narratives and synthesized five designer-user co-creation patterns (two design reflexivity and three role reflexivity). The significance of this study is to open the importance of co-creation on the designer-user interaction, and it seeks to empirically explore the patterns of co-creation and suggests a theoretical / practical guideline for researchers and practitioners in the community of design process.