Comments on Kothalawala et al.
Comments on Kothalawala et al.
复制标题
对 Kothalawala 等人的评论
DOI:
10.1111/pai.13386
复制
发表时间:
2021
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Zhang,Yijia
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Owora,ArthurH;Zhang,Yijia
Abstract To the Editor, Systematic reviews of the growing literature on preschool asthma prediction can help determine whether the available evidence supports the use of existing prognostic models to inform childhood asthma prevention and clinical management. These backward-looking measures do not summarize the predicted outcome probabilities and do not directly address questions about the impact of prognostic models on patient outcomes. 6-8 Moreover, they also do not account for the fact that prognostic model accuracy may change over time as more children develop asthma, the outcome being predicted. I Second i, it may also be informative to categorize infants or children using prognostic models as those who did or did not experience the predicted asthma outcomes within a specified time interval, and then look back to categorize the prognostic model's risk strata and its accuracy for that point in time.[Extracted from the article]Copyright of Pediatric Allergy & Immunology is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. Copyright applies to all Abstracts.