The Framing of Games and the Psychology of Strategic Choice
The Framing of Games and the Psychology of Strategic Choice
复制标题
博弈的框架和战略选择的心理学
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2006
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
H. Hennig
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
M. Dufwenberg;S. Gaechter;H. Hennig
心理博弈论可以为框架效应提供理性选择的解释;框架影响信念，信念影响动机。我们从理论上解释这一点，并探索其经验相关性实验。在一个2×2析因框架设计的一次性公益实验中，我们发现框架影响被试的一阶和二阶信念以及贡献。从心理博弈论的框架，我们得出两个相互兼容的假设下，内疚厌恶和互惠的贡献是相关的二阶和一阶的信念，分别。我们的结果与两者都一致。
Psychological game theory can provide a rational choice explanation of framing effects; frames influence beliefs, and beliefs influence motivations. We explain this point theoretically, and explore its empirical relevance experimentally. In a 2×2-factorial framing design of one-shot public good experiments we show that frames affect subject’s first- and second-order beliefs, and contributions. From a psychological game-theoretic framework we derive two mutually compatible hypotheses about guilt aversion and reciprocity under which contributions are related to second- and first-order beliefs, respectively. Our results are consistent with either.