Another look at the role of empty categories in sentence processing (and grammar)
Another look at the role of empty categories in sentence processing (and grammar)
复制标题
DOI：
10.1023/b:jopr.0000010514.50468.30
复制
发表时间：
2004-01-01
影响因子：
2
通讯作者：
Lee, MW
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Lee, MW
心理语言学文献中关于间隙/无间隙加工的争论对比了两种加工模型：一种假设基于痕迹的政府和约束（或原则和参数）语法和（增强的）主动填充策略，另一种假设无痕迹依赖范畴语法和依赖形成原则。本文报告了一项实验，该实验发现了反对无间隙/无痕迹模型的新证据，考虑了为什么在以前的研究中没有发现这些证据，并探讨了将（部分）无痕迹语法和增强的主动填充策略结合在一起的解析器是否可以解释当前的发现。
The gap/gapless processing debate in the psycholinguistics literature contrasts two processing models: one that assumes the trace-based Government and Binding (or Principles and Parameters) Grammar and the (augmented) Active Filler Strategy and one that assumes the traceless Dependency Categorial Grammar and the Principle of Dependency Formation. This paper reports on an experiment that found new evidence against the gapless/traceless model, considers why such evidence was not found in previous studies, and explores whether a parser that combines a (partially) traceless grammar and the augmented Active Filler Strategy can explain the current finding.