Commentary on "Principal Stratification - a Goal or a Tool?" by Judea Pearl
Commentary on "Principal Stratification - a Goal or a Tool?" by Judea Pearl
复制标题
DOI：
10.2202/1557-4679.1341
复制
发表时间：
2011-01-01
影响因子：
1.2
通讯作者：
Wolfson, Julian
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Gilbert, Peter B.;Hudgens, Michael G.;Wolfson, Julian
This commentary takes up Pearl's welcome challenge to clearly articulate the scientific value of principal stratification estimands that we and colleagues have investigated, in the area of randomized placebo-controlled preventive vaccine efficacy trials, especially trials of HIV vaccines. After briefly arguing that certain principal stratification estimands for studying vaccine effects on post-infection outcomes are of genuine scientific interest, the bulk of our commentary argues that the "causal effect predictiveness" (CEP) principal stratification estimand for evaluating immune biomarkers as surrogate endpoints is not of ultimate scientific interest, because it evaluates surrogacy restricted to the setting of a particular vaccine efficacy trial, but is nevertheless useful for guiding the selection of primary immune biomarker endpoints in Phase I/II vaccine trials and for facilitating assessment of transportability/bridging surrogacy.
