Quantitative clinical glycomics strategies: A guide for selecting the best analysis approach.
Quantitative clinical glycomics strategies: A guide for selecting the best analysis approach.
复制标题
DOI:
10.1002/mas.21688
复制
发表时间:
2022-11
影响因子:
6.6
通讯作者:
Desaire H
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Patabandige MW;Pfeifer LD;Nguyen HT;Desaire H
Glycans introduce complexity to the proteins to which they are attached. These modifications vary during the progression of many diseases; thus, they serve as potential biomarkers for disease diagnosis and prognosis. The immense structural diversity of glycans makes glycosylation analysis and quantitation difficult. Fortunately, recent advances in analytical techniques provide the opportunity to quantify even low-abundant glycopeptides and glycans derived from complex biological mixtures, allowing for the identification of glycosylation differences between healthy samples and those derived from disease states. Understanding the strengths and weaknesses of different quantitative glycomics analysis methods is important for selecting the best strategy to analyze glycosylation changes in any given set of clinical samples. To provide guidance towards selecting the proper approach, we discuss four widely used quantitative glycomics analysis platforms, including fluorescence-based analysis of released N-linked glycans and three different varieties of MS-based analysis: LC-MS analysis of glycopeptides, MALDI-TOF MS, and LC-ESI-MS analysis of released N-linked glycans. These methods’ strengths and weaknesses are compared, particularly associated with the figures of merit that are important for clinical biomarker studies, including: the initial sample requirements, the methods’ throughput, sample preparation time, the number of species identified, the methods’ utility for isomer separation and structural characterization, method-related challenges associated with quantitation, repeatability, the expertise required, and the cost for each analysis. This review, therefore, provides unique guidance to researchers who endeavor to undertake a clinical glycomics analysis by offering insights on the available analysis technologies.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子:
5.4
作者:
Go, Eden P.;Herschhorn, Alon;Desaire, Heather
通讯作者:
Desaire, Heather
影响因子:
7.4
作者:
Chen B;Zhong X;Feng Y;Snovida S;Xu M;Rogers J;Li L
通讯作者:
Li L
DOI:
10.1083/jcb.200808124
发表时间:
2009-03-23
期刊:
The Journal of cell biology
影响因子:
--
作者:
Glozman R;Okiyoneda T;Mulvihill CM;Rini JM;Barriere H;Lukacs GL
通讯作者:
Lukacs GL
影响因子:
9.3
作者:
Chen, Jie;Li, Xueli;He, Miao
通讯作者:
He, Miao
影响因子:
4.3
作者:
Alvarez-Manilla, Gerardo;Warren, Nicole Lynn;Orlando, Ron
通讯作者:
Orlando, Ron