Redefining Evolutionary Economics
Redefining Evolutionary Economics
复制标题
DOI：
10.14441/eier.3.3
复制
发表时间：
2006-06-01
影响因子：
0.9
通讯作者：
Nishibe, Makoto
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Nishibe, Makoto
本文的目的是从演化经济学的正反两个方面对演化经济学进行重新定义。消极认同是作为对新古典主义经济学的反驳而形成的，其假设是最优化的代理人和均衡，这起到了导致积极认同的“愿景”的作用。根据这一愿景，市场不是一个普遍设计或构建的系统，而是一个自创生系统或自发秩序。为了具体说明积极的身份，我们检查进化经济学的本体论/认识论的双重含义，需要经济和经济学之间的递归关系。演化经济学被重新定义为大规模、复杂和不确定经济的经济学，它是一个松散连接的系统，具有微观-宏观循环结构，由规则或惯例、多层缓冲区和惯例等社会制度促进。它也意味着经济学内部的“类比-进化多元主义”方法以及元经济学在经济学与经济学史或其他科学学科之间的关系方面。
The aim of this paper is to redefine evolutionary economics in view of its negative and positive identities. The negative identity is formed as a counterargument to neoclassical economics with the hypotheses of optimizing agents and equilibrium, and this functions as a 'vision' that leads to the positive identity. According to the vision, the market is not a universally designed or constructed system, but an autopoietic system or a spontaneous order. In order to specify the positive identity, we examine the ontological/epistemological double meanings of evolutionary economics that entail a recursive relation between economy and economics. Evolutionary economics is redefined as the economics of a large-scale, complex and uncertain economy that exists as a loosely connected system with a micro-macro loop structure, facilitated by such social institutions as rules or conventions, multi-layered buffers and routines. It also means the 'analogical-evolutionary pluralist' approach within economics as well as meta-economics in terms of the relationship between economics and history of economics or other disciplines of science.