Evaluation of the Second Edition of Entering Research: A Customizable Curriculum for Apprentice-Style Undergraduate and Graduate Research Training Programs and Courses.

Evaluation of the Second Edition of Entering Research: A Customizable Curriculum for Apprentice-Style Undergraduate and Graduate Research Training Programs and Courses.
复制标题

DOI:
10.1187/cbe.19-04-0073
复制
发表时间:
2020-03
期刊:
CBE life sciences education
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Smith AR
Smith AR
中科院分区:
其他
文献类型:
--
作者:
Branchaw JL;Butz AR;Smith AR

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

进入研究(ER)第二版是一个可定制的主动学习活动、资源以及评估和评估工具的集合,用于本科生和研究生研究培训计划和课程。报告了检验第二版ER课程有效性的两项设计和开发研究的结果,以及为期两天的ER促进员培训讲习班。在全国20个地点(42个独特的实施)对第二版课程进行了试点测试,78名辅导员和565名本科生和研究生受训人员提供了证据,证明ER活动是明确和完整的,它们有效地帮助受训人员获得知识或提高他们的研究能力。总体而言,研究培训计划主任和受训者对纳入急诊室活动的课程和研讨会感到满意。同样,来自四个应急协调员培训讲习班的评价数据表明,与会者重视讲习班,并报告说,他们对成功制定和实施定制应急课程的能力有了很大的信心。综上所述,这些结果提供了证据,证明ER课程和培训研讨会保证了进一步的有效性、有效性和扩大研究。
The second edition of Entering Research (ER) is a collection of customizable active-learning activities, resources, and assessment and evaluation tools for use in undergraduate and graduate research training programs and courses. Results from two design and development research studies examining the effectiveness of the second edition of the ER curriculum and a 2-day ER facilitator training workshop are reported. Pilot testing of the second edition of the curriculum at 20 sites across the country (42 unique implementations) with 78 facilitators and 565 undergraduate and graduate research trainees provides evidence that the ER activities are clear and complete and that they were effective in helping trainees gain knowledge or improve their ability to do research. Overall, research training program directors and trainees were satisfied with courses and workshops that incorporated activities from ER. Likewise, evaluation data from four ER facilitator training workshops showed that participants valued the workshop and reported significant gains in confidence in their ability to successfully develop and implement a custom ER curriculum. Together, these results provide evidence that the ER curriculum and training workshop warrant further efficacy, effectiveness, and scale-up research.
DOI: 10.1187/cbe.09-10-0073
发表时间: 2010-06-01
影响因子: 3.7
作者:
Balster, Nicholas;Pfund, Christine;Branchaw, Janet
通讯作者: Branchaw, Janet
DOI: 10.1187/cbe.10-12-0145
发表时间: 2011-12-01
影响因子: 3.7
作者:
Byars-Winston, Angela;Gutierrez, Belinda;Carnes, Molly
通讯作者: Carnes, Molly
DOI: 10.1111/j.1744-6570.2004.tb02496.x
发表时间: 2004-06-01
影响因子: 5.5
作者:
Eby, L;Butts, M;Simon, SA
通讯作者: Simon, SA
DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-4560.2011.01710.x
发表时间: 2011-01-01
影响因子: 3.9
作者:
Chemers, Martin M.;Zurbriggen, Eileen L.;Bearman, Steve
通讯作者: Bearman, Steve
DOI: 10.1002/tea.21146
发表时间: 2014-05-01
影响因子: 4.6
作者:
Chang, Mitchell J.;Sharkness, Jessica;Newman, Christopher B.
通讯作者: Newman, Christopher B.