The politics of co-production: risks, limits and pollution
The politics of co-production: risks, limits and pollution
复制标题
DOI：
10.1332/174426415x14412037949967
复制
发表时间：
2016-05-01
影响因子：
2.1
通讯作者：
Cunningham, Malaika
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Flinders, Matthew;Wood, Matthew;Cunningham, Malaika
联合制作是一种冒险的社会调查方法。它耗时、伦理复杂、情感要求高、内在不稳定、容易受到外部冲击、受到相互竞争的要求，而且它挑战许多纪律规范。这就是它如此新鲜和创新的原因。然而，这些与研究相关的风险很少被讨论，因此，在培训和研究过程中，降低风险的战略仍然不够完善。正是出于这个原因，本文引用了玛丽·道格拉斯的“社会污染”概念，以理解联合制作的紧张和挑战。它试图揭露联合制作通常隐藏的政治。
Co-production is a risky method of social inquiry. It is time-consuming, ethically complex, emotionally demanding, inherently unstable, vulnerable to external shocks, subject to competing demands and it challenges many disciplinary norms. This is what makes it so fresh and innovative. And yet these research-related risks are rarely discussed and, as a result, risk-reduction strategies remain under-developed within training and research processes. It is for exactly this reason that this article draws upon Mary Douglas's notion of 'social pollution' in order to understand the tensions and challenges of co-production. It seeks to expose the generally hidden politics of co-production.