Estimating a preference-based single index for the Impact of Weight on Quality of Life-Lite (IWQOL-lite) instrument from the SF-6D

Estimating a preference-based single index for the Impact of Weight on Quality of Life-Lite (IWQOL-lite) instrument from the SF-6D
复制标题

DOI:
10.1111/j.1524-4733.2004.74012.x
复制
发表时间:
2004-07-01
期刊:
影响因子:
4.5
通讯作者:
Williams, GR
Williams, GR
中科院分区:
医学2区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Brazier, JE;Kolotkin, RL;Williams, GR

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

目的:为了便于对治疗肥胖的干预措施进行经济评估,我们估计了一个基于偏好的单一指数,即体重对生活质量的影响--通过将其映射到SF-6D基于偏好的指数上,来使用IWQOL-lite仪器。1972名个体的异质样本,由社区志愿者和减肥计划、临床试验和胃旁路研究的参与者组成,完成了IWQOL-lite(一种肥胖特异性健康相关生活质量(HRQOL)指标)和SF-36(一种转换为基于偏好的SF-6D的HRQOL通用指标)。结果:预测SF-6D各指标得分的最佳拟合模型以各项目的水平为自变量(交叉验证样本中R-2 = 0.530,平均绝对误差为0.0976)。该模型(1)比使用总分、维度得分或项目得分作为因变量的模型做出更少的假设,(2)提供了来自IWQOL-Lite数据的基于偏好的指数的稳健无偏估计,其中未使用基于偏好的测量。年龄和体重指数(BMI)的增加导致了轻微的改善model.Conclusions:这是可能的,以促进经济评价使用特定疾病的工具,使用这种方法获得的结果。这种方法的一个弱点是,可能有一些方面的条件,尚未适当反映在SF-6D指数。不过,在尚未实行优惠措施和进行全面估值调查不切实际的情况下,这一办法是有用的。
Objective: To facilitate economic evaluations of interventions for treating obesity, we estimated a preference-based single index for the Impact of Weight on Quality of Life-Lite (IWQOL-lite) instrument by mapping it onto the SF-6D preference-based index.Methods: A heterogeneous sample of 1972 individuals, composed of community volunteers and participants in weight loss programs, clinical trials, and gastric bypass studies, completed the IWQOL-lite, an obesity-specific measure of health-related quality of life (HRQOL), and the SF-36, a generic measure of HRQOL converted into the preference-based SF-6D. Models of the relationship between the IWQOL-lite and SF-6D of increasing complexity were estimated by regression analyses.Results: The best fitting model for predicting SF-6D index scores entered levels for each item as independent variables (R-2 = 0.530 in the cross-validation sample, with a mean absolute error of 0.0976). This model (1) makes fewer assumptions than those using total score, dimension scores or item scores as dependent variables and (2) provides a robust unbiased estimate of a preference-based index from IWQOL-Lite data where a preference-based measure was not used. The addition of age and body mass index (BMI) led to a slight improvement in the model.Conclusions: It is possible to facilitate economic evaluations using results obtained from disease-specific instruments using this approach. A weakness of this approach is that there may be aspects of the condition that have not been properly reflected in the SF-6D index. It is, however, useful when a preference-based measure has not been administered and when it would be impractical to conduct a full valuation survey.