The Great Crystallite Versus Random Network Controversy: A Personal Perspective
The Great Crystallite Versus Random Network Controversy: A Personal Perspective
复制标题
伟大的微晶与随机网络之争：个人观点
DOI：
10.1111/ijag.12039
复制
发表时间：
2014
影响因子：
2.1
通讯作者：
A. Wright
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
A. Wright
介绍了微晶和随机网络理论的支持者之间的争论的历史，这些理论主导了网络玻璃的结构理论大约50年，并且在许多教科书中覆盖得很差，如果不是不准确的话。从1835年的早期微晶理论开始，概述了用来解释氧化物玻璃的组成和结构的各种理论的发展。揭示了随机网络理论的真正起源，并简要总结了导致现代微晶或cybotactic理论的论点，以及（早期）微晶和随机网络理论的支持者之间的和解。本文最后根据现代实验和计算机模拟技术提供的数据，简要讨论了氧化物玻璃的组成和结构理论的现状。
An account is presented of the history of the controversy between supporters of the crystallite and random network theories, which dominated the structural theories of network glasses for approximately 50 years, and is very poorly, if not inaccurately, covered in many textbooks. The development of the various theories proposed to explain the constitution and structure of oxide glasses is outlined, starting with the early crystallite theory of 1835. The true origin of the random network theory is revealed, and a short summary is given of the arguments that led to the modern crystallite or cybotactic theory and of the reconciliation between the supporters of the (early) crystallite and random network theories. The paper concludes with a brief discussion of the present status of the theories of the constitution and structure of oxide glasses, in light of the data provided by modern experimental and computer modelling/simulation techniques.