Towards a standardised brief outcome measure: psychometric properties and utility of the CORE-OM
Towards a standardised brief outcome measure: psychometric properties and utility of the CORE-OM
复制标题
DOI：
10.1192/bjp.180.1.51
复制
发表时间：
2002-01-01
影响因子：
10.5
通讯作者：
Audin, K
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Evans, C;Connell, J;Audin, K
背景：需要一个可接受的、标准化的结果测量来评估多学科心理治疗的疗效和有效性。目的介绍CORE-OM （Clinical Outcomes in Routine Evaluation - Outcome Measure）对电荷的信度、效度和敏感性的心理测量数据。方法采用主观幸福感、症状、功能、风险等34项自述量表。分析包括内部信度、重测信度、社会人口统计学差异、探索性主成分分析、与其他工具的相关性、临床和非临床样本之间的差异以及临床组内变化的评估。结果内部信度和重测信度良好（0.75-0.95），与其他7种仪器的收敛效度相同，临床和非临床样本之间差异较大，对变化具有良好的敏感性。结论coreom是一种可靠、有效的仪器，具有良好的变化敏感性。它在广泛的实践环境中是可以接受的。利益声明无。资金详情见致谢。
Background An acceptable, standardised outcome measure to assess efficacy and effectiveness is needed across multiple disciplines offering psychological therapies.Aims To present psychometric data on reliability, validity and sensitivity to charge for the CORE-OM (Clinical Outcomes in Routine Evaluation - Outcome Measure).Method A 34-item self-report instrument was developed, with domains of subjective well-being, symptoms, function and risk. Analysis includes internal reliability, test-retest reliability, socio-demographic differences, exploratory principal-component analysis, correlations with other instruments, differences between clinical and non-clinical samples and assessment of change within a clinical group.Results Internal and test-retest reliability were good (0.75-0.95), as was convergent validity with seven other instruments, with large differences between clinical and non-clinical samples and good sensitivity to change.Conclusions The CORE OM is a reliable and valid instrument with good sensitivity to change. It is acceptable in a wide range of practice settings.Declaration of interest None. Funding detailed in Acknowledgements.