Socioeconomic impacts of household participation in emission trading scheme: A Computable General Equilibrium-based case study

Socioeconomic impacts of household participation in emission trading scheme: A Computable General Equilibrium-based case study
复制标题

家庭参与排放交易计划的社会经济影响:基于可计算一般均衡的案例研究

DOI:
10.1016/j.apenergy.2021.116647
复制
发表时间:
2021-02-23
期刊:
影响因子:
11.2
通讯作者:
Wang, Can
Wang, Can
中科院分区:
工程技术1区
文献类型:
--
作者:
An, Kangxin;Zhang, Shihui;Wang, Can

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

家庭碳减排行为政策对气候行动具有重要作用,但在实践中却被忽视。无论是发达国家还是发展中国家,现行政策都无法控制家庭能源消耗,这对于实现雄心勃勃的气候目标来说是低效的。家庭参与排污权交易是一种有价值的解决方案。加强对该政策的社会经济影响的了解,将有助于在排放交易计划国家的实地部署和发展。采用扩展的线性支出系统和排污权交易机制的动态可计算一般均衡模型分析了排污权交易的影响。通过对中国的案例研究发现,与没有家庭参与的ETS相比,家庭参与可以减少农村和城市家庭45.5%和28.1%的碳排放,减少13.60-14.01%的碳减排成本,减少家庭福利损失,影响2050年的社会公平。碳配额分配机制对家庭福利和社会公平具有重要影响。该方法可用于其他区域,以探讨影响的程度。本研究证明了家庭参与碳排放交易体系的好处,并为政策制定者设计一个谨慎合理的全球家庭碳减排政策提供了一些启示。
Policy on household carbon reduction behavior has an important role on climate actions but is neglected in practice. Household energy consumption is uncontrolled under the current policy both in the developed and developing countries, which is inefficient towards an ambitious climate target. Household participation in emission trading scheme (ETS) is a valuable solution. Enhancing understanding of socioeconomic impacts of the policy will facilitate the deployment and development on ground in the countries with ETS. The dynamic computable general equilibrium model with extended linear expenditure system and emission trading scheme, is used to analyze the impacts. With the case study of China, we find that compared with ETS without household participation, household participation can reduce 45.5% and 28.1% of carbon emissions of rural and urban households, reduce 13.60-14.01% of carbon mitigation cost, reduce household welfare loss and influence social equity in 2050. The allocation mechanism of carbon allowances has significant impact on household welfare and social equity. The methodology can be applied in other regions to explore the magnitude of impacts. This study evidences the benefits of household participation in ETS, and provides policy-makers some insights to design a careful and reasonable household carbon reduction policy around the world.