Undue inducement: Nonsense on stilts?
Undue inducement: Nonsense on stilts?
复制标题
DOI：
10.1080/15265160500244959
复制
发表时间：
2005-09-01
影响因子：
13.4
通讯作者：
Emanuel, EJ
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Emanuel, EJ
不当诱导是生物医学研究中一种常见的指控。太普通了。指控几乎总是不准确和不正确的。它通常反映了一个单独的伦理问题，已经被转化并附加到对诱惑的关注。这种转变是错误的，通常会分散人们对应该解决的真实的伦理问题的注意力。从这个意义上说，不正当引诱的指控不仅是错误的，而且可能是有害的。因此，我们应该摒弃有关不正当引诱的主张，这些主张是挑衅性的，大多数读者会认为它们即使不是荒谬的，也是奇怪的。它们意在挑衅，以使我们从自满和不注意使用术语中震惊出来。我们，生物伦理学家和其他参与研究伦理学的人，已经停止了对不当诱导的批判性思考，需要接受挑战，系统地重新审视这一概念及其在研究伦理学中所扮演的角色。
Undue inducement is a very common charge in biomedical research. Too common. The charge is almost always inaccurate and incorrect. It usually reflects a separate ethical concern that has been transmuted and appended to a concern about inducements. This transformation is wrong, and usually distracts people from a real ethical concern that should be addressed. In this sense, the charge of undue inducement is not only wrong it can be harmful. Therefore, we should banish the claim about undue inducement.These are provocative claims, and most readers will think them odd if not ridiculous. They are meant to be provocative to shock us out of our complacency and inattentive use of terms. We, bioethicists and others involved in research ethics, have stopped critically thinking about undue inducement, and need to be challenged to systematically re-examine the concept and the role it plays in research ethics.