Surgeon decision-making for management of positive sentinel lymph nodes in the post-Multicenter Selective Lymphadenectomy Trial II era: A survey study.
Surgeon decision-making for management of positive sentinel lymph nodes in the post-Multicenter Selective Lymphadenectomy Trial II era: A survey study.
复制标题
多中心选择性淋巴结切除术后II期阳性前哨淋巴结处理的外科医生决策:一项调查研究。
DOI:
10.1002/jso.26302
复制
发表时间:
2021-03
影响因子:
2.5
通讯作者:
Zager JS
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Hui JYC;Burke E;Broman KK;Marmor S;Jensen E;Tuttle TM;Zager JS
Completion lymph node dissection (CLND) did not improve melanoma-specific survival for patients with sentinel lymph node (SLN) positive melanoma in the second Multicenter Selective Lymphadenectomy Trial (MSLT-II). We assessed surgeons’ awareness of MSLT-II and its impact on CLND recommendations. An anonymous online cross-sectional survey of the Society of Surgical Oncology membership evaluated surgeon thresholds in offering CLND using patient scenarios and clinicopathologic characteristics ranking. Of the 2881 e-mails delivered, 146 surgeons (5.1%) completed all seven scenarios. Most (129 of 131, 98%) were aware of MSLT-II and 125 (95%) found it practice-changing. Specifically, 52% (65 of 125) always, 40% usually, 6% rarely, and 3% never offered CLND prior to MSLT-II. Meanwhile, 4% always, 9% usually, 78% rarely, and 8% never offer CLND now, after MSLT-II (p<0.0001). The most important clinicopathologic factors in determining CLND recommendations were extracapsular extension, number of positive SLN and SLN tumor deposit size, while primary tumor mitotic index and nodal basin location were the least important. Surgical oncology fellowship training, melanoma patient volume and academic center practice also influenced CLND recommendations. Most surgeon respondents are aware of MSLT-II, but its application in practice varies according to several clinicopathologic and surgeon factors.
登录
查看更多内容
DOI:
10.1056/nejmoa1613210
发表时间:
2017-06-08
期刊:
The New England journal of medicine
影响因子:
--
作者:
Faries MB;Thompson JF;Cochran AJ;Andtbacka RH;Mozzillo N;Zager JS;Jahkola T;Bowles TL;Testori A;Beitsch PD;Hoekstra HJ;Moncrieff M;Ingvar C;Wouters MWJM;Sabel MS;Levine EA;Agnese D;Henderson M;Dummer R;Rossi CR;Neves RI;Trocha SD;Wright F;Byrd DR;Matter M;Hsueh E;MacKenzie-Ross A;Johnson DB;Terheyden P;Berger AC;Huston TL;Wayne JD;Smithers BM;Neuman HB;Schneebaum S;Gershenwald JE;Ariyan CE;Desai DC;Jacobs L;McMasters KM;Gesierich A;Hersey P;Bines SD;Kane JM;Barth RJ;McKinnon G;Farma JM;Schultz E;Vidal-Sicart S;Hoefer RA;Lewis JM;Scheri R;Kelley MC;Nieweg OE;Noyes RD;Hoon DSB;Wang HJ;Elashoff DA;Elashoff RM
通讯作者:
Elashoff RM
影响因子:
--
作者:
DeFazio, Jennifer L.;Marghoob, Ashfaq A.;Halpern, Allan
通讯作者:
Halpern, Allan
影响因子:
51.1
作者:
Leiter, Ulrike;Stadler, Rudolf;Garbe, Claus
通讯作者:
Garbe, Claus
影响因子:
3.7
作者:
Rossi, Carlo Riccardo;Mocellin, Simone;Ribero, Simone
通讯作者:
Ribero, Simone
影响因子:
3.7
作者:
Wong, Sandra L.;Balch, Charles M.;Lyman, Gary H.
通讯作者:
Lyman, Gary H.