GAILLONELLA VS. GALLIONELLA
GAILLONELLA VS. GALLIONELLA
复制标题
加洛内拉 VS.
DOI：
10.1080/0269249x.2009.9705790
复制
发表时间：
2009
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
P. Silva
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
P. Silva
Gaillonella是由Bory de Saint-Vincent （1823, p. 393）命名的一种硅藻属。该属在文章“Confewa moniliformis OF miler（1783）”中被描述，但直到1825年Bory发表了一篇特别的文章“Gaillonelle”才被指定为模式种。Robert Ross在《植物学名索引》（Farr et al. 1979）中的条目和Fourtanier & Kociolek（1999）中的条目都是不正确的，因为它们将1825年作为植物学名的有效出版日期，而不是1823年。该属以弗朗索瓦·本杰明·盖永（1782 - 839）命名，他是一位不太知名的法国生物学家，以在迪耶普担任海关官员为生。Gaillon认为所有那些本身会运动的藻类或有活动繁殖阶段的藻类都是动物，他把它们放在没有排名的Nemazoaires组中。硅藻构成了Navicultes亚群。Gaillon的主要出版物，Aperp d 'histoire naturelle（1833）的书目复杂性是由Silva（1959）讨论的。为了纪念盖永，鲍里可能是在承认盖永的发现，即牡蛎的变色是由一种微生物引起的，鲍里认为这种微生物是硅藻（Vibrio ostrearius Gaillon 1820，是haaslea Simonsen属的模式种，1974）。大概是为了强调这些藻类的动物性质，盖隆将现有的通用名称改为它们的小名。因此，例如，Achnanthes被改为Achnantella， Nostoc被改为Nostocella， Vaucheria被改为Vaucheriella。一种不太可能的解释是，他喜欢结尾的谐音，林格拜用它来命名Echinella， C. Agardh用它来命名Nitella，鲍里用它来命名Gaillonella。不管什么原因，他采用了Bory的属名，并发表了属内的两个特定名称，G. moniliformis (OF Muller) Gaillon和G. jurgensii (C. Agardh) Gaillon （Meloseira jurgensii C. Agardh）。这些组合中的第一个被错误地归因于Bow。
Gaillonella is the name given to a genus of diatoms by Bory de Saint-Vincent (1823, p. 393). The genus was described in the article “Confervtes”, but the type species, Confewa moniliformis OF Miiller (1783), was not designated until Bory published a special article,“Gaillonelle”, in 1825. The entry that was contributed to the Index Nominum Genericorum (Plantarum)(Farr et al. 1979) by Robert Ross and the entry in Fourtanier & Kociolek (1 999) are incorrect in that they give 1825 as the date of valid publication of the generic name rather than 1823.The genus was named for Franqois Benjamin Gaillon (1 782-1 839), a lesser-known French biologist who made his livelihood as a customs officer in Dieppe. Gaillon considered all those algae that are motile themselves or have motile reproductive stages to be animals, which he placed in the unranked group Nemazoaires. Diatoms constituted the subgroup Navicultes. The bibliographic complexity of Gaillon’s chief publication, Aperp d’histoire naturelle (1 833), is discussed by Silva (1 959). In commemorating Gaillon, Bory was possibly acknowledging Gaillon’s discovery that the discoloration of oysters was caused by a microorganism that Bory recognized as a diatom (Vibrio ostrearius Gaillon 1820, the type species of the genus Haslea Simonsen 1974). Presumably to emphasize the animal nature of these algae, Gaillon changed existing generic names to their diminutive equivalents. Thus, eg, Achnanthes was changed to Achnantella, Nostoc to Nostocella, and Vaucheria to Vaucheriella. A less likely explanation is that he liked the euphony of the ending as used by Lyngbye for Echinella, C. Agardh for Nitella, and Bory for Gaillonella. Whatever the reason, he adopted Bory‘s generic name and published two specific names within the genus, G. moniliformis (OF Muller) Gaillon and G. jurgensii (C. Agardh) Gaillon (Meloseira jurgensii C. Agardh). The first of these combinations was incorrectly attributed to Bow.