Social Exclusion and Pain Sensitivity: Why Exclusion Sometimes Hurts and Sometimes Numbs

Social Exclusion and Pain Sensitivity: Why Exclusion Sometimes Hurts and Sometimes Numbs
复制标题

DOI:
10.1177/0146167211422449
复制
发表时间:
2012-02-01
影响因子:
4
通讯作者:
Claypool, Heather M.
Claypool, Heather M.
中科院分区:
心理学2区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Bernstein, Michael J.;Claypool, Heather M.

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

一些研究表明,社会排斥导致情感和身体疼痛敏感性增加,而其他工作表明,排斥导致情感和身体疼痛麻木。这项研究试图研究是什么导致了这些相反的结果。在研究1中,用于实例化社会排斥的范例被发现缓和了社会排斥-身体疼痛的关系:未来生活排斥导致身体疼痛麻木,而赛博球排斥导致超敏反应。研究2探讨了潜在的机制,这是假设为严重程度的“社会伤害”。“参与者要么受到标准的未来生活排除操纵(据称是一种高度严重的社会伤害),要么受到新创建的不太严重的版本。支持我们的假设,标准(高度严重)的未来生活排除导致身体疼痛麻木,而不太严重的未来生活排除导致超敏反应。这些结果的影响,了解排斥疼痛的关系和其他排斥效应进行了讨论。
Some research indicates that social exclusion leads to increased emotional- and physical-pain sensitivity, whereas other work indicates that exclusion causes emotional- and physical-pain numbing. This research sought to examine what causes these opposing outcomes. In Study 1, the paradigm used to instantiate social exclusion was found to moderate the social exclusion-physical pain relation: Future-life exclusion led to a numbing of physical pain whereas Cyberball exclusion led to hypersensitivity. Study 2 examined the underlying mechanism, which was hypothesized to be the severity of the "social injury." Participants were subjected to either the standard future-life exclusion manipulation (purported to be a highly severe social injury) or a newly created, less-severe version. Supporting our hypothesis, the standard (highly severe) future-life exclusion led to physical-pain numbing, whereas the less-severe future-life exclusion resulted in hypersensitivity. Implications of these results for understanding the exclusion-pain relation and other exclusion effects are discussed.