Impact of Welfare Benefit Sanctioning on Food Insecurity: a Dynamic Cross-Area Study of Food Bank Usage in the UK

Impact of Welfare Benefit Sanctioning on Food Insecurity: a Dynamic Cross-Area Study of Food Bank Usage in the UK
复制标题

福利制裁对粮食不安全的影响:英国粮食银行使用情况的动态跨区域研究

DOI:
10.1017/s0047279417000915
复制
发表时间:
2018
影响因子:
2
通讯作者:
LOOPSTRA R
LOOPSTRA R
中科院分区:
法学1区
文献类型:
--
作者:
LOOPSTRA R

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

自 2009 年以来,作为更广泛的紧缩和福利改革议程的一部分,英国对失业保险申请人的制裁率显着增加。 2013 年,实施了超过 100 万人的制裁,停止发放福利至少四个星期,可能使人们面临经济困难并迫使他们使用食品银行。在这里,我们将 Trussel Trust Foodbank Network 的数据与英国 259 个地方当局的制裁率记录联系起来,探讨制裁是否与食品银行的使用有关。考虑到地方当局的差异和时间趋势后,随着每 10 万名成年人的制裁率增加 10 名,每 10 万名成年人接受食物银行喂养的成年人比例又增加了 3.36 名成年人(95% CI:1.71 至 5.01)。食品分发地点的可用性影响制裁与食品银行使用之间的关联程度(p < 0.001);在分发点很少的地区,制裁力度加大导致食品银行使用量增幅较小。总之,制裁与食品银行使用量的增加密切相关,但制裁对家庭粮食不安全的影响并未充分反映在现有数据中。
Since 2009, the UK has witnessed marked increases in the rate of sanctions applied to unemployment insurance claimants, as part of a wider agenda of austerity and welfare reform. In 2013, over one million sanctions were applied, stopping benefit payments for a minimum of four weeks and potentially leaving people facing economic hardship and driving them to use food banks. Here we explore whether sanctioning is associated with food bank use by linking data from The Trussell Trust Foodbank Network with records on sanctioning rates across 259 local authorities in the UK. After accounting for local authority differences and time trends, the rate of adults fed by food banks rose by an additional 3.36 adults per 100,000 (95% CI: 1.71 to 5.01) as the rate of sanctioning increased by 10 per 100,000 adults. The availability of food distribution sites affected how tightly sanctioning and food bank usage were associated (p < 0.001); in areas with few distribution sites, rising sanctions led to smaller increases in food bank usage. In conclusion, sanctioning is closely linked with rising food bank usage, but the impact of sanctioning on household food insecurity is not fully reflected in available data.
提交给下议院工作和养老金委员会的证据,调查奥克利审查之外的福利制裁政策 (SAN0110)
DOI: --
发表时间: 2014
期刊:
影响因子: --
作者:
D. Webster
通讯作者: D. Webster
加大福利制裁力度:增加就业的有效工具?
DOI: --
发表时间: 2014
期刊:
影响因子: --
作者:
Bernhard Boockmann;Stephan L. Thomsen;T. Walter
通讯作者: T. Walter
食品慈善事业的兴起:问题与挑战
DOI: --
发表时间: 2016
期刊:
影响因子: --
作者:
H. Lambie
通讯作者: H. Lambie
DOI: 10.4135/9781483349985.n225
发表时间: 2020
期刊: The Grants Register 2022
影响因子: --
作者:
M. Kibuuka
通讯作者: M. Kibuuka
DOI: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2009.07.002
发表时间: 2010-01-01
影响因子: 2.5
作者:
Huang, Jin;Guo, Baorong;Kim, Youngmi
通讯作者: Kim, Youngmi