ANTIFEEDING DEFENSE IN BALTIC MACROALGAE: INDUCTION BY DIRECT GRAZING VERSUS WATERBORNE CUES 1
ANTIFEEDING DEFENSE IN BALTIC MACROALGAE: INDUCTION BY DIRECT GRAZING VERSUS WATERBORNE CUES 1
复制标题
波罗的海大型藻类的拒食防御：直接放牧诱导与水源提示 1
作者：
S. Rohde;M. Wahl
海洋巨藻抗放牧防御诱导的普遍程度和触发诱导的线索目前还不清楚。本文研究了波罗的海五种常见多年生大型藻的防御能力和调节机制。拉莫尔。，嗜血杆菌（嗜血杆菌）拉莫尔。，假ceranoides Phyllophora （s.g.g Gmel.）Newroth et A. R. A. Taylor, Fucus serratus L, Fucus evanesens C. Agardh。具体来说，我们调查了直接喂食和/或从邻近同种动物身上获得的水生线索是否会降低被测试藻类的适口性。当地等足动物波罗的海Idotea baltica的直接摄食触发了皮毛化学防御的诱导。蚓蝇、血蝇、伪ceranoides、serratus和evanesens。相反，我们没有发现任何证据表明水生线索与摄食有关，从而引发邻近同种动物的防御感应。
The prevalence of antigrazing defense induction and the cues triggering induction in marine macroalgae are generally not well understood. We examined the capacity of defense and the mechanisms of regulation in five common perennial macroalgal species from the Baltic Sea, Furcellaria lumbricalis (Huds.) J. V. Lamour., Delesseria sanguinea (Huds.) J. V. Lamour., Phyllophora pseudoceranoides (S. G. Gmel.) Newroth et A. R. A. Taylor, Fucus serratus L., and Fucus evanescens C. Agardh. Specifically, we investigated whether direct feeding and/or waterborne cues from feeding on neighboring conspecifics decreased the palatability of the tested algae. Direct feeding by the local isopod Idotea baltica triggered the induction of chemical defense in Fur. lumbricalis, D. sanguinea, P. pseudoceranoides, F. serratus, and F. evanescens. Conversely, we did not find any evidence for waterborne cues associated with feeding to trigger defense induction in neighboring conspecifics.