Public priorities for joint pain research: results from a general population survey.

Public priorities for joint pain research: results from a general population survey.
复制标题

DOI:
10.1093/rheumatology/kes179
复制
发表时间:
2012-11
期刊:
Rheumatology (Oxford, England)
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Arthritis Research UK Research Users’ Group
Arthritis Research UK Research Users’ Group
中科院分区:
其他
文献类型:
--
作者:
Strauss VY;Carter P;Ong BN;Bedson J;Jordan KP;Jinks C;Arthritis Research UK Research Users’ Group

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

Objective.我们的目的是从一项大型的一般人群调查中确定关节疼痛研究的优先事项,并确定与这些优先事项相关的特征。方法.与英国关节炎研究初级保健中心的研究用户组合作开发了一个关于研究优先事项的问题。该问题嵌入在对北斯塔福德郡年龄≥56岁的现有自报关节疼痛成人队列的邮寄调查中。受访者被要求对他们的三大研究优先事项进行排名。使用因素混合模型来确定优先事项分组。结果共有1756人(88%)对调查作出了回应。其中,1356人(77%)提出了三个研究优先事项。38%的人认为保持活跃是最重要的,其次是关节置换(9%)和饮食/减肥(9%)。确定了两组人群:62%的人首选生活方式/自我管理主题(例如保持活跃,减肥)和38%的人首选医疗干预主题(例如关节置换,片剂)。那些更喜欢医疗选择的人往往年龄较大,并且有臀部或脚部疼痛。结论这项研究提供了一个大型队列的老年人谁报告关节疼痛的关节疼痛研究的优先事项的人口数据。最受欢迎的研究主题与生活方式和自我管理机会有关。药物和侵入性干预措施,尽管是常见的研究课题,是不太重要的,这些受访者比非医疗主题。本研究将与患者小组合作产生具体的研究问题。
Objective. We aimed to identify the priorities for joint pain research from a large general population survey and identify characteristics associated with these priorities. Methods. A question about research priorities was developed in collaboration with the Arthritis Research UK Primary Care Centre’s Research Users’ Group. The question was embedded in a postal survey to an existing cohort of adults with self-reported joint pain, aged ≥56 years, in North Staffordshire. Respondents were asked to rank their top three priorities for research. Factor mixture modelling was used to determine subgroups of priorities. Results. In all, 1756 (88%) people responded to the survey. Of these, 1356 (77%) gave three priorities for research. Keeping active was rated the top priority by 38%, followed by research around joint replacement (9%) and diet/weight loss (9%). Two clusters of people were identified: 62% preferred lifestyle/self-management topics (e.g. keeping active, weight loss) and 38% preferred medical intervention topics (e.g. joint replacement, tablets). Those who preferred the medical options tended to be older and have hip or foot pain. Conclusion. This study has provided population data on priorities for joint pain research expressed by a large cohort of older people who report joint pain. The most popular topics for research were linked to lifestyle and self-management opportunities. Pharmaceutical and invasive interventions, despite being common topics of research, are of less importance to these respondents than non-medical topics. Specific research questions will be generated from this study with collaboration of the patient’s group.
DOI: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2008.00492.x
发表时间: 2008-12-01
影响因子: 3.2
作者:
Owens, Christabel;Ley, Ann;Aitken, Peter
通讯作者: Aitken, Peter
DOI: 10.3402/qhw.v6i3.7035
发表时间: 2011
影响因子: 1.8
作者:
Ong BN;Jinks C;Morden A
通讯作者: Morden A
DOI: 10.1037/0278-6133.23.3.324
发表时间: 2004-05-01
期刊: HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY
影响因子: 4.2
作者:
Figaro, MK;Russo, PW;Allegrante, JP
通讯作者: Allegrante, JP
DOI: 10.1111/j.0006-341x.1999.00463.x
发表时间: 1999-06-01
期刊: BIOMETRICS
影响因子: 1.9
作者:
Muthén, B;Shedden, K
通讯作者: Shedden, K
DOI: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2004.00232.x
发表时间: 2004-03-01
影响因子: 3.2
作者:
Marsden, J;Bradburn, J
通讯作者: Bradburn, J