Here – Hither – Hence and Related Categories
Here – Hither – Hence and Related Categories
复制标题
这里 – 这里 – 因此以及相关类别
DOI：
10.1515/9783110672640
复制
发表时间：
2020
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Nicole Hober
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Julia Nintemann;Maja Robbers;Nicole Hober
本文旨在建立空间疑问句(SIS)的类型学，并将其与地点、目的和来源三个基本空间关系中的陈述句(SDDS)进行比较。在一种功能理据的类型学方法中，我们从所有宏观领域的250种语言样本中识别了早期现代英语SIS的等价词：从哪里到哪里，从哪里来的近指示语(ND)SDS-因此，以及那里的远指示语(FD)SDDS。对这些表达进行定性和定量评估，以推断编码模式的区域和全球趋势。分析了空间疑问句范式和空间陈述句范式之间的形式关系，重点分析了范畴和个体细胞的融合。表1显示了具有不同编码模式的两种语言，即。最明显的编码图案(芬兰语)和最不明显的编码图案(班巴拉)。
The present work aims at establishing a typology of spatial interrogatives (SIs) in comparison to their declarative counterparts (SDDs) in the three basic spatial relations Place, Goal, and Source. In a functionally motivated typological approach, equivalents of the Early Modern English SIs WHERE – WHITHER – WHENCE, near deictic (ND) SDDs HERE – HITHER – HENCE, and far deictic (FD) SDDs THERE – THITHER – THENCE are identified across a sample of 250 languages from all macro-areas. The expressions are both qualitatively and quantitatively assessed to extrapolate areal and global trends of coding patterns. The formal relationships between spatial interrogative and spatial declarative paradigms are analyzed with a focus on the syncretism of categories and of individual cells. Table 1 displays two languages with different coding patterns, viz. a maximally distinct coding pattern (Finnish) and a maximally indistinct coding pattern (Bambara).