Intercultural Learning Assessment: The Link between Program Duration and the Development of Intercultural Sensitivity.
Intercultural Learning Assessment: The Link between Program Duration and the Development of Intercultural Sensitivity.
复制标题
跨文化学习评估:项目持续时间与跨文化敏感性发展之间的联系。
DOI:
10.36366/frontiers.v10i1.141
复制
发表时间:
2004
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Adriana Medina
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Adriana Medina
At a time when global markets, communication technologies, and transportation systems have vastly increased multicultural contact in our daily lives, it is essential that “we develop communication skills and abilities that are appropriate to a multicultural society and to life in a global village” (Samovar & Porter, 2000). Institutions of higher education are striving to address these needs on one level by offering a broad array of study abroad programs that will encourage different types of students to study abroad. Engle and Engle (2003) have identified seven key components of study abroad programs that define their variety: program duration, entry language competence of participants, extent to which target language is used in coursework on site, context of academic work, type of housing arrangements, provisions for guided cultural/experiential learning, and structured opportunities for students to reflect on their cultural experiences. Given the growing emphasis on internationalizing higher education and the rapidly increasing number of students embarking on study abroad programs each year, research on student learning outcomes, especially those related to cultural learning, is assuming greater value and relevance. The study presented here aims to enhance our understanding of intercultural learning by focusing on the link between the development of intercultural sensitivity and the first of Engle and Engle’s key study abroad components, program duration. It has long been argued that program duration is instrumental in achieving desired intercultural learning outcomes. Gudykunst (1979) concludes that “contact of only a short duration does not allow enough time to establish attitudes to change. The short duration of the contact results in an incomplete psychological experience for the participants” (p. 4). Similarly, Bennett (1993) suggests that it takes at least two years in the target country to develop basic levels of adaptive behavior and to acquire a new worldview (p. 55). For Leong and Ward (2000), the longer individuals stay in the