Working with archived classic family and community studies: illuminating past and present conventions around acceptable research practice
Working with archived classic family and community studies: illuminating past and present conventions around acceptable research practice
复制标题
处理存档的经典家庭和社区研究：阐明过去和现在围绕可接受的研究实践的惯例
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2012
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
R. Edwards
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Val Gillies;R. Edwards
这篇文章阐述了如何利用20世纪60年代的经典家庭和社区研究档案，围绕可接受的研究实践，对过去和现在的研究惯例提出不同的看法。我们通过观察数据的性质并确认是谁产生了数据，最终将重点放在可接受和不可接受的研究人员账户的含义上，从而认为“良好”的方法论行为的构成。过去的惯例提出了关于将原始数据和背景结合在一起的问题，这些数据和背景在研究领域是活跃的，而目前对“良好”道德实践的理解成为一种可疑的叙事。
This article addresses the ways that working with archived classic family and communities studies from the 1960s can throw a different light on past and present research conventions around acceptable research practice. We consider the constitution of ‘good’ methodological conduct through looking at the nature of data and acknowledgement of who generates it, culminating in a focus on the implications of acceptable and unacceptable researcher accounts. Past conventions raise questions about the merging of primary data and context alongside which is active in the research field, while present understandings of ‘good’ ethical practice become a suspect narrative.