The mechanism of retention of pelagic tomcod, Microgadus tomcod, larvae and juveniles in the well-mixed part of the St. Lawrence Estuary
The mechanism of retention of pelagic tomcod, Microgadus tomcod, larvae and juveniles in the well-mixed part of the St. Lawrence Estuary
复制标题
圣劳伦斯河口混合部分中上层真鳕、小真真鳕、幼虫和幼鱼的滞留机制
DOI:
10.1007/bf00001186
复制
发表时间:
1990
影响因子:
1.4
通讯作者:
J. Dodson
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
R. Laprise;J. Dodson
We tested the hypothesis that the mechanism of retention of tomcod,Microgadus tomcod, larvae and juveniles in the well-mixed part of the St. Lawrence Estuary is similar to that of sympatric smelt,Osmerus mordax, larvae who actively migrate to the surface during flood tides and to the bottom during ebb tides so as to minimize net downstream displacement. The vertical distribution of tomcod larvae and juveniles was documented during two 98-h sampling series at 2 anchor stations in June and July, 1986. An hourly index of the center of mass of fish in the water column calculated to take into account daytime net avoidance in surface waters suggested that tomcod remained deep in the water column and that their accumulation at the head of the estuary was the result of passive upstream transport by net residual circulation rather than active tidal migrations. For both series, depth of fish was inversely related to density of the water suggesting that the buoyancy of fish influenced their vertical distribution. Tomcod larvae and juveniles were advected by tidal currents. In June, larger larvae were found at low slack water indicating that they were located upstream of smaller larvae. In July, larger juveniles were located downstream of smaller juveniles, the difference in mean length between low and high slack water attaining 20 mm. Ontogenetic buoyancy changes may be responsible for these differences in the vertical distribution of tomcod. Comparisons of the early life-history stages of tomcod and smelt retained in the same area under the same hydrodynamical conditions indicate that more than one mechanism permits retention in a well-mixed estuary and that the observed species-specific patterns of vertical distribution are not simply interpretable as adaptations to retention.