Role of morphological variability in the evolution of nearshore sandbars
Role of morphological variability in the evolution of nearshore sandbars
复制标题
形态变异在近岸沙洲演化中的作用
DOI:
10.1016/j.coastaleng.2012.05.005
复制
发表时间:
2012
影响因子:
4.4
通讯作者:
M. Stive
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
M. Smit;A. Reniers;M. Stive
Computations using a depth-averaged morphological process-based model of a double nearshore bar system have been used to test the hypothesis that bathymetries with small variability adapt more easily to new hydrodynamic conditions than bathymetries with distinctly imprinted crescentic patterns. The computations are used to investigate the assumption that nearshore bathymetries tend to evolve toward a rip-channelled pattern matching concurrent constant hydrodynamic forcing, if these conditions prevail for an extended period of time. In each computation an initially alongshore uniform double barred bathymetry, seeded with a small random bed-level perturbation, was forced by two sequential constant hydrodynamic conditions. For each set of conditions, four different computations show the effect of a later transition moment – and thus more distinctly evolved patterns – on the level of adaptation to the second condition. After the transition to the second condition, different hydrodynamic circulations occur due to differences in the bathymetry at the transition moments. Depending on how pronounced the existing features were at the moment of transition, these circulations either reinforce the existing bathymetric pattern or allow the bathymetry to evolve to a new rip-chanelled pattern with a spacing similar to the one that occurs if the second condition had been applied from the start. As hydrodynamic conditions generally change more rapidly than the adaptation time, which is at least in the order of days, it is highly unlikely that observed rip channel distances match length scales expected for concurrent hydrodynamic conditions, consistent with field observations (e.g. Holman et al., 2006). It is therefore concluded that nearshore patterns are formed by a combination of both the antecedent morphology – and thus antecedent hydrodynamics – and the current local hydrodynamic conditions, next to factors like sediment characteristics.