Guidelines to Classify Female Subject Groups in Sport-Science Research
Guidelines to Classify Female Subject Groups in Sport-Science Research
复制标题
DOI：
10.1123/ijspp.2015-0153
复制
发表时间：
2016-03-01
影响因子：
3.3
通讯作者：
Meeusen, Romain
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Decroix, Lieselot;De Pauw, Kevin;Meeusen, Romain
目的：回顾目前自行车相关的体育科学文献，制定指南，对女性学科组进行分类，并将女性学科组的分类系统与男性学科组的分类系统进行比较。方法;分析了82篇描述女性受试者组的文献数据库，其中包含实验前最大周期方案设计、术语、生物统计学和生理学参数以及骑自行车经验的信息。结果：女性PL分为5组，分别代表未训练、活动、训练、良好训练和职业女性。PL组中，除PL 3和PL 4外，VO 2 max和PPO均随PL的增加而增加（P
Aim: To review current cycling-related sport-science literature to formulate guidelines to classify female subject groups and to compare this classification system for female subject groups with the classification system for male subject groups. Methods; A database of 82 papers that described female subject groups containing information on preexperimental maximal cycle-protocol designs, terminology, biometrical and physiological parameters, and cycling experience was analyzed, Subject groups were divided into performance levels (PLs), according to the nomenclature. Body mass, body-mass index, maximal oxygen consumption (VO2max), peak power output (PPO), and training status were compared between PLs and between female and male PLs, Results: Five female PLs were defined, representing untrained, active, trained, well-trained, and professional female subjects, VO2max and PPO significantly increased with PL, except for PL3 and PL4 (P