Co-responsibility for research integrity
Co-responsibility for research integrity
复制标题
研究诚信的共同责任
DOI：
10.1007/s11948-003-0014-0
复制
发表时间：
2003
影响因子：
3.7
通讯作者：
C. Mitcham
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
C. Mitcham
为了扩大对科研诚信的科学责任的讨论，本文提供了两个历史哲学的观察。首先，在思想的广阔历史中，现代伦理学以抽象原则的诉求取代了社会角色责任;相比之下，科学界对研究诚信责任的讨论构成了对角色责任持续活力的重新发现。这是一种哲学本身可能从中受益的重新发现。第二，在科学家关注的问题方面，角色责任的概念经历了重大演变，从“集体责任”演变为“跨科学界”的责任概念。然而，在将科学作用、对科学诚信的责任与科学与社会的关系联系起来方面，仍然存在着进一步的挑战。为了不仅在科学领域而且在科学与社会的关系中促进诚信的概念，从科学诚信的“共同责任”的角度来思考可能是有益的。
To enlarge the discussion of scientific responsibility for research integrity, this paper offers two historico-philosophical observations. First, in the broad history of ideas, modern ethics replaces social role responsibility with appeals to abstract principles; by contrast, discussions within the scientific community of responsibility for research integrity constitute a rediscovery of the continuing vitality of role responsibility. This is a rediscovery from which philosophy itself may benefit. Second, within the context of scientists’ concerns, the idea of role responsibility has undergone significant evolution from “collective responsibility” to the notion of responsibility resting with a “trans-scientific community.” Further challenges nevertheless remain in order to relate scientific role responsibility for scientific integrity to the relationship between science and society. To promote a notion of integrity not just in science but in the science-society relationship, it may be useful to think in terms of a “co-responsibility” for scientific integrity.