Does a High Tech (Computerized, Animated, Powerpoint) Presentation Increase Retention of Material Compared to a Low Tech (Black on Clear Overheads) Presentation?
Does a High Tech (Computerized, Animated, Powerpoint) Presentation Increase Retention of Material Compared to a Low Tech (Black on Clear Overheads) Presentation?
复制标题
与低科技（透明开销上的黑色）演示相比，高科技（计算机化、动画、Powerpoint）演示是否可以提高材料的保留率？
DOI：
10.1207/s15328015tlm1702_3
复制
发表时间：
2005
影响因子：
2.5
通讯作者：
James Short
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
R. Ricer;A. Filak;James Short
背景：在没有研究证明其有效性的情况下，计算机化数字演示已经成为大多数医学院的标准。目的：目的是确定(a)主观评价的差异；(b)短期保留材料；(c)对医学生的演示使用静态间接费用与计算机化的动画PowerPoint相比，材料的长期保留。方法：所有学生轮流参加由一名教员讲授的标准讲座。演示的内容保持不变，但教学媒体有所不同（偶数月的管理费用，奇数月的动画幻灯片）。学生们在讲座结束后立即完成后测和主观评价，并在一年后重复后测。两组比较采用非配对t检验。结果：两组间各项指标无显著性差异。结论：在本研究中，学生对两种类型的陈述的评价相同，并且在短期和长期记忆材料方面没有差异。
Background: Computerized digital presentations have become standard in most medical schools without research proving their effectiveness. Purpose: The purpose was to determine if differences in (a) subjective evaluation; (b) short-term retention of material; and (c) long-term retention of material occurred with the use of static overheads versus computerized, animated PowerPoint for a presentation to medical students. Methods: All students rotating on a required clerkship attended a standard lecture presented by 1 faculty member. The content of the presentation remained the same, but the instructional media varied (overheads on even months, animated PowerPoint on odd months). Students completed a posttest and subjective evaluation immediately following the lecture and repeated the posttest 1 year later. Unpaired t tests were used to compare the 2 groups. Results: There were no significant differences between the groups on any parameter. Conclusions: In this study, students rated both types of presentation equally and displayed no differences in short- or long-term retention of material.
口腔解剖学传统讲座与计算机教学的比较。
DOI：
--
发表时间：
1998
期刊：
Journal of dental education.
影响因子：
--
作者：
Bachman,MW;Lua,MJ;Clay,DJ;Rudney,JD
通讯作者：
Rudney,JD