Challenging the age of austerity: Disruptive agency after the global economic crisis
Challenging the age of austerity: Disruptive agency after the global economic crisis
复制标题
挑战紧缩时代：全球经济危机后的颠覆性机构
DOI：
10.1057/s41295-016-0072-8
复制
发表时间：
2016
影响因子：
1.7
通讯作者：
Bailey D
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Bailey D
本文探讨了在2008年后的全球和欧洲危机背景下发展起来的破坏性主观性的不同形式。这篇文章追溯了2008年前和2008年后的事态发展，特别关注西班牙和英国的事件。之所以选择这些国家背景，是因为它们在危机产生的影响方面有很大的不同；然而，我们看到所观察到的拒绝和抵抗的情况有显著的相似之处，特别是在所持动机和采取的形式方面，尽管规模不同。本文介绍了定性研究的结果，包括65次深度访谈，以突出2008年之后不满、寻求声音和威胁退出剥削关系的方式作为异议手段都存在问题。因此，我们看到这些更传统的异议形式与一些在2008年之前发展起来的更激进的预想做法相结合。因此，新自由主义资本主义自2008年以来的停滞见证了一种新形式的实用主义预言性颠覆性主观性的发展，这是当代先进工业民主国家一些更重要、更有趣的政治发展的原因。
This article explores the different forms of disruptive subjectivity that have developed in the context of the post-2008 global and European crises. The article traces developments both before and after 2008, with a specific focus on events in Spain and the UK. These country contexts are chosen due to their considerable differences in terms of the impact that the crisis had; yet we witness notable similarities with regard to the instances of refusal and resistance observed, especially in terms of the motives held and forms adopted, albeit with differences in scale. The paper presents the results of qualitative research, including 65 in-depth interviews, to highlight the way in which disaffection, the search for voice, and the threat of withdrawal from relations of exploitation have each become problematic as means of dissent following 2008. As a result, we have seen a merging of these more conventional forms of dissent with a number of more radical prefigurative practices that had been developing prior to 2008. As a result, the stagnation of neoliberal capitalism from 2008 onwards has witnessed the development of a new form of pragmatically prefigurative disruptive subjectivity, responsible for some of the more important and interesting political developments in contemporary advanced industrial democracies.
登录
查看更多内容
占领戴姆街是一场缓慢的总罢工？
影响因子：
1.5
作者：
Nicholas Kiersey
通讯作者：
Nicholas Kiersey
影响因子：
3.1
作者：
Marien, Sofie;Hooghe, Marc;Quintelier, Ellen
通讯作者：
Quintelier, Ellen
影响因子：
2.6
作者：
L. Ezrow;Timothy Hellwig
通讯作者：
Timothy Hellwig
紧缩时期的社会运动：将资本主义带回抗议分析中
影响因子：
2.5
作者：
D. Porta
通讯作者：
D. Porta
危机引发的欧盟社会冲突——工会视角：“危机社团主义”的出现还是社团主义安排的失败？
影响因子：
2.4
作者：
H. Bieling;Julia Lux
通讯作者：
Julia Lux