What is beyond the big five?
What is beyond the big five?
复制标题
DOI：
10.1111/1467-6494.00022
复制
发表时间：
1998-08
影响因子：
5
通讯作者：
G. Saucier;L. R. Goldberg
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
G. Saucier;L. R. Goldberg
以前的研究者已经提出，各种各样的个人描述内容--比如态度或价值观的差异，纯粹的评价，吸引力，或者身高和腰围--都没有被大五模型充分捕捉到。我们报告了一个相当详尽的搜索可靠的来源大五独立的变化，从人的描述性形容词的数据。五十三个候选集群开发的大学样本使用不同的方法和来源。在一个非学生的成人样本中，集群进行了评估，相对于一个极大极小的标准：最小的多重相关因素，从大五标记和最大的可靠性。最明显的五大独立集群是指身高，腰围，肥胖，就业状况，年轻和负价（或低基本率属性）。与时尚性、性感/诱惑力、美丽、男子气概、节俭、幽默、财富、傲慢、民俗、狡猾和运气有关的聚类似乎可能超出了大五因素，尽管这些聚类中的每一个都显示出大五因素的多重相关性为0.30至0.45，并且至少有一个与大五因素的相关性为0.20或更高。在所有这些内容领域中，吸引力、负价和吸引力的各个方面被发现由大量不同的、常见的形容词来表示。结果表明，方向补充大五，当一个人希望扩展变量选择领域以外的人格特质，如传统定义。
Previous investigators have proposed that various kinds of person-descriptive content--such as differences in attitudes or values, in sheer evaluation, in attractiveness, or in height and girth--are not adequately captured by the Big Five Model. We report on a rather exhaustive search for reliable sources of Big Five-independent variation in data from person-descriptive adjectives. Fifty-three candidate clusters were developed in a college sample using diverse approaches and sources. In a nonstudent adult sample, clusters were evaluated with respect to a minimax criterion: minimum multiple correlation with factors from Big Five markers and maximum reliability. The most clearly Big Five-independent clusters referred to Height, Girth, Religiousness, Employment Status, Youthfulness and Negative Valence (or low-base-rate attributes). Clusters referring to Fashionableness, Sensuality/Seductiveness, Beauty, Masculinity, Frugality, Humor, Wealth, Prejudice, Folksiness, Cunning, and Luck appeared to be potentially beyond the Big Five, although each of these clusters demonstrated Big Five multiple correlations of .30 to .45, and at least one correlation of .20 and over with a Big Five factor. Of all these content areas, Religiousness, Negative Valence, and the various aspects of Attractiveness were found to be represented by a substantial number of distinct, common adjectives. Results suggest directions for supplementing the Big Five when one wishes to extend variable selection outside the domain of personality traits as conventionally defined.