Assessing interdisciplinary academic and multi-stakeholder positions on transparency in the post-Snowden leak era
Assessing interdisciplinary academic and multi-stakeholder positions on transparency in the post-Snowden leak era
复制标题
评估后斯诺登泄密时代跨学科学术和多利益相关者对透明度的立场
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2015
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Andrew McStay
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
V. Bakir;Andrew McStay
根据正在进行的esrc资助的系列研讨会（2015-2016）的辩论，“辩论和评估透明度安排：隐私，安全，监视，信任”（DATAPSST!），我们确定了参与者在后斯诺登泄密时代对透明度的立场。参与者包括来自不同学科的学者，以及参与透明度问题的利益相关者。我们提出了一个原始的透明类型；并发展可见性滑块的隐喻，以突出在控制、管理、规范和协议方面构思的隐私的核心方面。类型学和隐喻共同阐明了当代监视的抽象、复杂状况，使透明安排得以澄清和评估。
Drawing on the debates in the ongoing ESRCfunded seminar series (2015-2016), ‘Debating and Assessing Transparency Arrangements: Privacy, Security, Surveillance, Trust’ (DATAPSST!), we identify stances on transparency in the post-Snowden leak era held by participants. Participants comprise academics from diverse disciplines, and stakeholders involved with transparency issues. We advance an original transparency typology; and develop the metaphor of the Visibility Slider to highlight the core aspect of privacy conceived in terms of control, management, norms and protocol. Together, the typology and metaphor illuminate the abstract, complex condition of contemporary surveillance, enabling clarification and assessment of transparency arrangements.