Themes and Variations: Taking Stock of the Advocacy Coalition Framework
Themes and Variations: Taking Stock of the Advocacy Coalition Framework
复制标题
主题和变化：盘点倡导联盟框架
DOI：
10.1111/j.1541-0072.2008.00299.x
复制
发表时间：
2009
影响因子：
3.8
通讯作者：
K. McQueen
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
C. Weible;P. Sabatier;K. McQueen
为简化公共政策的复杂性而制定的一个政策过程框架是倡导联盟框架。本文报告了近20年来80个ACF应用的分析。评论表明，ACF是适用于各种实质性的主题，在不同的地理区域，并与其他政策过程理论和框架，包括阶段启发式。最常被检验的假设涉及政策变化、学习和联盟稳定性。虽然假设往往得到证实，问题仍然存在的成员资格，稳定性和背叛的联盟成员，有关的因果机制连接外部事件和政策变化，以及促进跨联盟学习的条件。新出现的研究领域包括政策子系统的相互依存关系以及联盟内部和联盟之间的协调。
A policy process framework that has been developed to simplify the complexity of public policy is the advocacy coalition framework (ACF). This essay reports on an analysis of 80 applications of the ACF spanning nearly 20 years. The review shows that the ACF is applicable to various substantive topics, across various geographical areas, and with other policy process theories and frameworks, including the stages heuristic. The most commonly tested hypotheses involve policy change, learning, and coalition stability. Although the hypotheses tend to be confirmed, questions remain about the membership, stability, and defection of coalition members; about the causal mechanisms linking external events and policy change; and about the conditions that facilitate cross-coalition learning. Emerging areas of research include policy subsystem interdependencies and coordination within, and between, coalitions.